Davenport v. MacLaren
| Docket Number | 17-2267 |
| Decision Date | 30 June 2020 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
18 cases
-
Brown v. Davenport
...28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1) ).DAfter that loss, Mr. Davenport appealed to the Sixth Circuit, where a divided panel reversed. Davenport v. MacLaren , 964 F.3d 448 (2020). Unlike the District Court, the Sixth Circuit declined to analyze the case under AEDPA. Instead, it held, only this Court's dec......
-
Davenport v. MacLaren
...that the Brecht test handles the work of both tests show that the test the panel majority applied accomplishes that principle. Davenport also recognizes that courts may choose to apply AEDPA/ Chapman before turning to Brecht ’s more demanding inquiry. In sum, Davenport merely reiterat......
-
Greene v. Forshey
... ... Because it interferes with the presumption of innocence, ... shackling is inherently prejudicial. Davenport v ... MacLaren , 964 F.3d 448 (6 th Cir. 2020). But ... the leading Supreme Court case on the question, Deck v ... Missouri , ... ...
-
Cooper v. Chapman
...we have consistently rejected the Warden's argument that a petitioner must satisfy AEDPA/Chapman and Brecht . Davenport v. MacLaren , 964 F.3d 448, 454–59 (6th Cir. 2020) ; Reiner , 955 F.3d at 557 ; O'Neal , 933 F.3d at 624–25.2 To avoid double-jeopardy issues, the state court vacated Coop......
Request a trial to view additional results