Davenport v. State

Decision Date27 November 1896
Citation20 So. 971,112 Ala. 49
PartiesDAVENPORT v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Chilton county; W. D. Denson, Judge.

Andrew Davenport was convicted for pointing a pistol at another, and appeals. Affirmed.

The appellant was tried and convicted under an indictment charging that he "had presented a pistol at Hubbard Glasscock, against the peace and dignity of the state of Alabama." This indictment was found under the provisions of "An act to protect human life," which is as follows:

"Section 1. Be it enacted by the general assembly of Alabama, that from and after the passage of this act it shall be unlawful for any person to present at another person any gun, pistol or other fire arm, whether loaded or unloaded.
"Sec 2. Be it further enacted, that any person who shall violate section 1 of this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and, on conviction thereof, shall be fined not less than ten or more than one hundred dollars." Acts 1888-89, p. 67.

The defendant moved to quash, and strike the indictment from the file, upon the following grounds: (1) Because the statute under which the indictment is drawn is violative of section 2, art. 4, of the constitution, in that the subject of the law is not clearly expressed in its title; and (2) that the statute under which the indictment is founded is violative of section 27, art. 1, of the constitution. This motion was overruled, and the defendant duly excepted. Upon the hearing of the cause, as is shown by the bill of exceptions, the evidence for the state tended to show that, within 12 months before the finding of the indictment, while Hubbard Glasscock was passing along a road, he met the defendant; that there ensued a quarrel, in which the said Glasscock told the defendant he would whip him when he was released from arrest that the defendant replied, if he thought he could whip him, he had better get down and do it then; that Glasscock dismounted from his horse, and approached the defendant, who was standing on the opposite side of his wagon, and took from his pocket a pocketknife; and that, when within about 15 steps of the defendant, the latter drew his pistol, and pointed it at Glasscock, telling him to stop. There were several charges asked by the defendant seeking to justify defendant pointing the pistol at Glasscock upon the ground of self-defense. These charges were each refused, and the defendant separately...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Davis v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • June 27, 1913
  • Harris v. State ex rel. Williams
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • November 23, 1933
    ...143; Jordan v. McClure Lumber Co., 170 Ala. 289 (13), 54 So. 415; State v. Skinner, 20 Ala. App. 204, 101 So. 327, 328; Davenport v. State, 112 Ala. 49, 20 So. 971, 972; Stone v. State, 137 Ala. 1, 34 So. 629, City Council of Montgomery v. National Bldg. & Loan Ass'n, 108 Ala. 336, 18 So. 8......
  • Sellers v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • February 6, 1913
    ...the felonious attack of another under such circumstances that he would be justified under the general law of self-defense. Davenport v. State, 112 Ala. 50, 20 So. 971. under our construction of the statute, it is not every shooting into another's dwelling that will constitute an offense und......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT