Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc.
Decision Date | 24 August 2000 |
Docket Number | No. 1998-SC-0554-DG.,1998-SC-0554-DG. |
Citation | 25 S.W.3d 94 |
Parties | Joseph DAVIDSON; and Thomas Davidson, Appellants, v. AMERICAN FREIGHTWAYS, INC., Appellee. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky |
Mike Breen, Mike Breen, Attorney at Law, P.S.C., Bowling Green, Richard M. Breen, Richard Breen Law Offices, P.S.C., Louisville, for Appellants.
Armer H. Mahan, Jr., Petersen Thomas, Lynch, Cox, Gilman & Mahan, P.S.C., Louisville, for Appellee.
M. Austin Mehr, Austin Mehr Law Offices, P.S.C., Lexington, for Amicus Curiae Kentucky Academy of Trial Attorneys.
On May 18, 1994, two tractor-trailer rigs, one owned by Appellee American Freightways, Inc. (AFI) and operated by its employee, William C. Jackson, and the other owned by Appellant Joseph Davidson and operated by Appellant Thomas Davidson, collided on Interstate Highway 65 just south of Louisville, Kentucky. At the time of the accident, AFI was insured by a liability insurance policy issued by Protective Insurance Company. However, the policy contained a $250,000.00 deductible; and AFI investigated, negotiated, litigated, and ultimately paid those claims with its own money. At trial on the tort claims, the Davidsons were granted a directed verdict on the issue of liability and the jury awarded them damages in the total sum of $71,143.27. The Davidsons then filed this action against AFI for compensatory and punitive damages arising out of AFI's alleged failure to attempt in good faith to effectuate a prompt, fair and equitable settlement of their tort claims prior to trial. The Jefferson Circuit Court entered a summary judgment in favor of AFI and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We granted discretionary review primarily to consider whether the Unfair Claims Settlement Practices Act (the UCSPA), KRS 304.12-230, and/or the so-called tort of "bad faith" apply to persons or entities who are either self-insured or uninsured. We conclude that both the statute and the common law tort apply only to persons or entities engaged in the business of insurance; hence, we affirm.
AFI is an interstate motor carrier and had complied with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. § 31139(b) and (e), thus had qualified as a "self-insured" under federal law to the extent of its $250,000.00 deductible. However, it had not complied with KRS 304.39-080(7), thus had not qualified as a "self-insured" under Kentucky law. KRS 304.39-080(6). Nor was it a "liability self-insurance group" as defined in KRS 304.48-030 so as to fall within the parameters of the only unfair claims settlement practices statute specifically applicable to self-insureds. KRS 304.48-240(2). Nevertheless, Appellants characterize AFI as a "self-insured" or, alternatively, as "an uninsured," rather than "an insured with a $250,000.00 deductible," presumably because KRS 304.12-220 specifically provides that the UCSPA does not apply to "an insured."1 Appellants conclude that since "an insured" is the only "person" specifically excluded from the provisions of the UCSPA, a self-insured or uninsured person must ipso facto be subject to the statute. Under this theory, any person or entity who is either uninsured or self-insured would be held to the same standards of conduct with respect to the negotiation and settlement of tort liability claims as is an insurance company which is in the business of entering into contracts under which it is paid to assume the risk of liability for claims brought against the other contracting party. Thus, even an uninsured owner of a "mom-and-pop" grocery store who balks at (or is "bull-headed" about) paying his/her own money to settle a premises liability claim would be subject to punitive damages for committing an unfair claims settlement practice in violation of the UCSPA. We reject this view as contrary to the expressed intent of the legislature in enacting the Insurance Code, contrary to the interpretation placed upon the UCSPA by the administrative agency charged with its enforcement, contrary to our own well-established precedents, and contrary to the interpretation given to similar statutes by all other state courts which have considered the issue to date. Such an interpretation also would require us to declare the UCSPA unconstitutional as violative of Section 51 of our Constitution.
Section 51 of the Constitution of Kentucky provides: "No law enacted by the General Assembly shall relate to more than one subject, and that shall be expressed in the title . . . ." The UCSPA is entitled, "AN ACT relating to insurance,"2 (not, e.g., "AN ACT relating to persons"). If the statute related to both insurance and to persons who are not insured, it would violate Section 51 and would be unconstitutional. E.g., McGuffey v. Hall, Ky., 557 S.W.2d 401, 406-07 (1977) ( ); Thompson v. Commonwealth, 159 Ky. 8, 166 S.W. 623 (1914) ( ). It is a well established principle of constitutional law and statutory construction that if a statute is reasonably susceptible to two constructions, one of which renders it unconstitutional, "the court must adopt the construction which sustains the constitutionality of the statute." American Trucking Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Transp. Cabinet, Ky., 676 S.W.2d 785, 789-90 (1984); see also Commonwealth v. Halsell, Ky., 934 S.W.2d 552, 554-55 (1996). Following this principle, we conclude that "AN ACT relating to insurance" pertains to insurance and not to persons or entities who are not insured.
Regardless of the impact of Section 51, the UCSPA was clearly intended to regulate the conduct of insurance companies. KRS 304.12-230 is not a unique creature of Kentucky statutory law. It is an almost verbatim adoption of the 1971 version of the model act formulated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) entitled "An Act Relating to Unfair Methods of Competition and Unfair and Deceptive Acts and Practices in the Business of Insurance." (Emphasis added.) See State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Reeder, Ky., 763 S.W.2d 116, 118 (1988); M. Breen, Bad Faith in Kentucky: A Primer, at 37 (The Kentucky Academy of Trial Attorneys undated). The NAIC model act has been adopted in one form or another in all fifty states and all territories of the United States. M. McFadden, Insurance Benefits Under the ADA: Discrimination or Business as Usual?, 28 Tort & Ins. L.J. 480, ___, n. 67 (1993).
KRS 304.12-230 provides as follows:
Thus, of the fourteen sections of the UCSPA, only two, sections (4) and (6), do not contain specific language referring to insurance policies, applications therefor, insureds, coverages, and/or proof of loss forms. It would be absurd to suggest that the legislature intended that twelve of the fourteen sections of this statute would apply only to claims against insurance companies, but that the other two would apply to "everyman." Appellants, however, assert that the phrase "any person" contained in the first sentence of the statute relates back to...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
B.L. v. Schuhmann
...to be protected by the statute." St. Luke Hosp., Inc. v. Straub , 354 S.W.3d 529, 534 (Ky. 2011) (citing Davidson v. Am. Freightways, Inc. , 25 S.W.3d 94, 99–100 (Ky. 2000) ). Here, assuming the allegations in the Plaintiffs' complaints are true, they fall within the class of persons KRS 62......
-
Yanero v. Davis, 1999-SC-0871-DG.
...unconstitutional, "the court must adopt the construction which sustains the constitutionality of the statute." Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc., Ky., 25 S.W.3d 94, 96 (2000) (quoting American Trucking Ass'n v. Commonwealth, Transp. Cabinet, Ky., 676 S.W.2d 785, 789-90 (1984)). Thus, w......
-
Bennett v. Bank of Am., N.A.
...does not provide a cause of action for a breach of good faith and fair dealing outside the insurance context. Davidson v. Amer. Freightways, Inc., 25 S.W.3d 94, 102 (Ky.2000) ( "[T]he tort of ‘bad faith’ appl[ies] only to those persons or entities (and their agents) who are engaged ... in t......
-
Bays v. SUMMITT TRUCKING, LLC
...Britton v. Wooten, 817 S.W.2d 443, 447 (Ky.1991). Kentucky has codified negligence per se in KRS § 446.070. See Davidson v. Amer. Freightways Inc., 25 S.W.3d 94, 99 (Ky.2000). Dekalands's summary judgment argument fails, however, because he has not put forth sufficient evidence to support a......
-
Supreme Court Of Kentucky Permits Third-Party Bad Faith Claim To Proceed Against Insurer Before Final Adjudication Of Coverage
...be maintained against an insurance company when the underlying claim is not covered by the policy. See Davidson v. Am. Freightways, Inc., 25 S.W.3d 94, 100 (Ky. 2000). Bad faith claims are therefore susceptible to dismissal when the insurer, either on a motion to dismiss or for summary judg......
-
CHAPTER 3 The Insurance Contract
...Association of Health Plans, Inc. v. Nichols, 227 F.3d 352 (6th Cir. 2000). State Court: Kentucky: Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc., 25 S.W.3d 94 (Ky. 2000). [41] 40 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 477b. See also: Seventh Circuit: Edward E. Gillen Co. v. Insurance Company of the State of Penns......
-
Chapter 3
...of Health Plans, Inc. v. Nichols, 227 F.3d 352 (6th Cir. 2000). State Courts: Kentucky: Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc., 25 S.W.3d 94 (Ky. 2000). [42] 40 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. § 477b. See also: Seventh Circuit: Edward E. Gillen Co. v. Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania, 74......