Davidson v. Lodge
Decision Date | 11 May 1886 |
Citation | 22 Mo.App. 263 |
Parties | ETHIE DAVIDSON ET UX., Appellants, v. SUPREME LODGE, KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS, Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
APPEAL from the St. Louis Circuit Court, GEORGE W. LUBKE, Judge.
Affirmed.
F. H. BACON, UPTON M. YOUNG, and ALEX. YOUNG, for the appellants: The laws of the endowment rank (Sec. 2, Art. 9), pointing out but the one way in which the beneficiaries could be changed, that way is the only way, and necessarily excludes all others. Coleman v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Honor, 18 Mo. App. 181.
HOUGH, OVERALL & JUDSON, for the respondent.
This action was brought to recover the sum of two thousand dollars, claimed to be due the female plaintiff by the terms of a beneficiary certificate issued by the defendant to her father, Frank K. Kirkpatrick, and payable to her. Since the issue of the certificate she intermarried with her co-plaintiff. The case was tried before the circuit court, sitting as a jury, upon the pleadings, an agreed statement of facts, and certain exhibits thereto, together with a deposition of Halyor Nelson, the “Supreme Master of Exchequer” of the defendant. Declarations of law were given and refused; but, as there is no controversy whatever as to the facts, these declarations of law become unimportant, the real question being whether the judgment of the court is the proper conclusion of law upon the conceded facts. There is, also, a preliminary question as to whether the court was right in excluding a portion of the deposition of Mr. Nelson on the ground that it was a mere expression of opinion upon the construction of a written instrument, and, as such, incompetent. This will be noticed in the proper place.
Stated briefly, the conceded facts were, that on the sixteenth of October 1879, Frank K. Kirkpatrick, being a member in good standing of the order known as Knights of Pythias, made an application for membership in the first and second classes of the department of that order in which the lives of members of the order are insured, known as the “Endowment Rank”; that, in this application he named the female plaintiff, his daughter, then Ethie Kirkpatrick, as the beneficiary in the certificate of membership in the second class, calling, under certain conditions, for the sum of two thousand dollars; that his application was accepted; and that he thereupon became a member in good standing of what was known as section 346 of Knights of Pythias, which section was located at Holden, Mo. It appears that the supreme lodge in collecting the dues necessary to keep up this scheme of mutual life insurance, does not deal with the individual members of the endowment rank, but deals with the different “Sections,” treating each as a unit; and that, when a section, becomes to a certain extent, in arrears in respect of its dues to the endowment fund, it is suspended as a section. It, also, appears that it is a part of this scheme that when a section is thus suspended, all the members of it become, ipso facto, suspended, and that their beneficiary certificates, by their own terms, become null and void. It appears, moreover, that provision is made in this scheme by which individual members of the suspended section may become reinstated and may receive what is known as a “clearance card,” which entitles them to become members of other sections, which are not in a state of suspension, within a period of six months, upon proof that they are in good standing in the order of Knights of Pythias and not in arrears in respect of dues. The manner in which a member thus suspended may be reinstated is prescribed at length and with careful detail by one of the statutes of the order, called “Constitution for Sections of Endowment Rank.” The provisions of this statute, so far as they appear to be material to the present controversy, are as follows:
“ .
“ .
“ .
“ .
“ .
On June 30, 1882, Section No. 346, located at Holden, Mo., to which Frank K. Kirkpatrick belonged was duly and regularly suspended by the supreme chancellor of the order for non-payment of assessments in the endowment rank. On the twenty-second day of October, 1882, which, it will be perceived, was more than three months after this suspension, Mr. Kirkpatrick made an application for reinstatement as a member of the endowment rank. This application was made on the same printed form which is used in original applications for membership in the endowment rank. It was headed, “Application for membership in the endowment rank, K. of P.” It proceeded to state that, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
The Belt Seed Co. v. Mitchelhill Seed Co.
...incompetent testimony on behalf of plaintiff. Jordan v. Daniels, 27 S.W. (2d) 1052; McClurg v. Whitney, 82 Mo. App. 625; Davidson v. Knights of Pythias, 22 Mo. App. 263; State ex rel. Met. Life Ins. Co. v. Shain, 121 S.W. (2d) 789; Spruce Co. v. Mays, 62 S.W. (2d) 824; Hunter v. Waterloo Ga......
-
Belt Seed Co. v. Mitchelhill Seed Co.
...incompetent testimony on behalf of plaintiff. Jordan v. Daniels, 27 S.W.2d 1052; McClurg v. Whitney, 82 Mo.App. 625; Davidson v. Knights of Pythias, 22 Mo.App. 263; State ex rel. Met. Life Ins. Co. v. Shain, S.W.2d 789; Spruce Co. v. Mays, 62 S.W.2d 824; Hunter v. Waterloo Gasoline Engine C......
-
Wilhelm v. Kansas City Public Service Co.
... ... plaintiff's physical condition, was not competent to ... construe the language of the records. Davidson v. Supreme ... Lodge, K.P., 22 Mo.App. 263. (5) The error of the court ... in admitting incompetent and prejudicial conclusions and ... opinions ... ...
-
Dunn v. Detroit Fed. of Musicians, Local No. 5, Am. Fed. of Musicians
...by its officers. Morey v. Monk, 142 Ala. 175, 38 So. 265;Manson v. Grand Lodge, 30 Minn. 509, 16 N. W. 395;Davidson v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias, 22 Mo. App. 263. Were the rule otherwise, payment might be refused upon the most frivolous and unjust grounds, and a precedent thus estab......