Davis Markel & Edwards v. Solomon
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
| Writing for the Court | Before CARRO |
| Citation | Davis Markel & Edwards v. Solomon, 612 N.Y.S.2d 28, 204 A.D.2d 182 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994) |
| Decision Date | 19 May 1994 |
| Parties | DAVIS MARKEL & EDWARDS, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Louis A. SOLOMON, Defendant-Appellant. |
Before CARRO, J.P., and ROSENBERGER, WALLACH, KUPFERMAN and TOM, JJ.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered March 12, 1993 which, inter alia, granted summary judgment to plaintiff on the issue of liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
"Generally, receipt and retention of a law firm's accounts, without objection within a reasonable time, and an agreement to pay a portion of the indebtedness, gives rise to an account stated." (Scheichet & Davis v. Steinger, 183 A.D.2d 479, 583 N.Y.S.2d 407). In this case, defendant admits that he retained plaintiff and paid an initial $4,000 retainer. Defendant has failed to introduce evidence of any objection to the accounts rendered by plaintiff, and his assertion that when he initially entered into an attorney-client relationship with plaintiff he made oral statements regarding his...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Legum v. Ruthen
...Dev. Co., 47 N.Y.2d 995, 420 N.Y.S.2d 212, 394 N.E.2d 282; Warner v. Nelkin, 206 A.D.2d 422, 614 N.Y.S.2d 66; Davis, Markel & Edwards v. Solomon, 204 A.D.2d 182, 612 N.Y.S.2d 28; Shea & Gould v. Burr, 194 A.D.2d 369, 598 N.Y.S.2d 261; Dreyer & Taub v. Rubinstein, 191 A.D.2d 236, 594 N.Y.S.2......
-
Stephanie R. Cooper, P.C. v. Robert
...Salans Hertzfeld Heilbronn Christy & Viener v. Between Bread E., 290 A.D.2d 381, 736 N.Y.S.2d 665 [2002]; Davis Markel & Edwards v. Solomon, 204 A.D.2d 182, 612 N.Y.S.2d 28 [1994] ...
- Simsbury Fund, Inc. v. New St. Louis Associates
-
Ellenbogen & Goldstein, P.C. v. Brandes
...commencement of their relationship to defer payment until proceeds were realized from plaintiff's efforts (see, Davis Markel & Edwards v. Solomon, 204 A.D.2d 182, 612 N.Y.S.2d 28). While there was clearly an accord that plaintiff would accept defendant's payment of the first $25,000 defenda......