Davis v. Davis

Decision Date04 March 1982
Docket NumberNo. 63031,63031
CitationDavis v. Davis, 288 S.E.2d 748, 161 Ga.App. 722 (Ga. App. 1982)
PartiesDAVIS v. DAVIS.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Gene W. Walters, Decatur, for appellant.

E. Christopher Harvey, Decatur, for appellee.

SOGNIER, Judge.

Joyce Davis filed a garnishment against Fulton County General Employees Pension Board based on a judgment against Harold Davis. The garnishee answered stating that $770.40 was due to Harold Davis, payable in the amount of $557.39 each month as a pension; the garnishee also stated that $647.19 was exempt from garnishment and that $215.73 was subject to garnishment and paid into court. Harold Davis traversed Joyce Davis' affidavit for garnishment claiming that the sums held by the garnishee and paid into court are pension funds that have not been paid or transferred to him and, therefore, are exempt from garnishment.

The trial court dismissed the garnishment on the grounds that the disability pension was not subject to garnishment under Code Ann. § 46-302 (Ga.L.1980, pp. 1769, 1772). Ms. Davis appeals.

Appellant contends that the 1980 amendment to Code Ann. § 46-302 was intended to prevent garnishment of a pension fund but to make the payments out of the fund subject to garnishment as they become due and payable. Code Ann. § 46-302 provides: "Funds or benefits from a pension or retirement program shall be exempt from the process of garnishment until paid or otherwise transferred to a member of such program or beneficiary thereof. Such funds or benefits, when paid or otherwise transferred to such member or beneficiary, shall be exempt from the process of garnishment only to the extent provided in section 46-301 for other disposable earnings, unless a greater exemption is otherwise provided by law." Appellee contends that the words "when paid or otherwise transferred to such member or beneficiary" means that the member or beneficiary must have actually received the sums and that the money has passed completely out of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • U.S. v. Bollin
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • March 2, 2001
    ...that address §§ 18-4-20 and 18-4-22 discuss shielding an IRA from a creditor attempting to collect a debt. See, e.g., Davis v. Davis, 288 S.E.2d 748 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982); Cooper v. Atlanta Policemen's Pension Fund, 249 S.E.2d 684 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978). Gormley's forfeiture judgment is not mere......
  • Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp. v. William L. Amos, Jenifer C. Amos, Wla Invs., Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Georgia
    • July 28, 2017
    ...defendant—the funds must literally pass through the defendant's hands before they are subject to garnishment. See Davis v. Davis, 288 S.E.2d 748, 749 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982) ("'Paid or otherwise transferred' in [the former version of this provision] means exactly what it says; if the legislatur......
  • Birchfield v. Birchfield
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • January 13, 1983
    ...the process of garnishment until such funds or benefits are in the hands of the member or beneficiary of the program." Davis v. Davis, 161 Ga.App. 722, 723, 288 S.E.2d 748. The exemption provided in Code Ann. § 46-302, supra, is applicable to a continuing garnishment. Code Ann. § 46-702(c) ......