Davis v. State

Docket NumberCR-98-1180
Decision Date30 May 2019

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Stocks v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 24, 2019
    ...proceedings, a petitioner's mere allegation of a Brady violation is not a sufficient basis for error coram nobis relief. Davis v. State , 2019 Ark. 172, 574 S.W.3d 666. When determining whether a Brady violation has occurred, it must first be determined if the material was available to the ......
  • Scott v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • October 10, 2019
    ...prong of Brady ; the evidence would not have created a "reasonable probability" of a different outcome. See, e.g. , Davis v. State , 2019 Ark. 172, 574 S.W.3d 666. Although the April 3, 2006 statement by Tamiko was not disclosed, the exculpatory material information contained in that April ......
  • Russell v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 27, 2021
    ...that it would have prevented rendition of the judgment had the existence of the evidence been known at the time of trial. Davis v. State , 2019 Ark. 172, 574 S.W.3d 666. Evidence is material if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the resul......
  • Tolston v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • January 16, 2020
    ...mere fact that a petitioner alleges a Brady violation is not sufficient to provide a basis for error coram nobis relief. Davis v. State , 2019 Ark. 172, 574 S.W.3d 666. When determining whether a Brady violation has occurred, it must first be established by the petitioner that the material ......
  • Get Started for Free