Davis v. State, 4 Div. 162.

Decision Date10 October 1940
Docket Number4 Div. 162.
Citation240 Ala. 160,198 So. 155
PartiesWOODROW DAVIS ET AL. v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Certiorari to Court of Appeals.

J. W. Brassell and W. R. Belcher, both of Phenix City, for the motion.

Thos. S. Lawson, Atty. Gen., and Francis M. Kohn, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Petition of Woodrow Davis and Raymond Martin for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in the case of Davis et al. v. State, 198 So. 153.

Writ denied.

BOULDIN, FOSTER, and LIVINGSTON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Brackin v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 30 d3 Junho d3 1943
    ...manifestly wrong and unjust, so we cannot disturb it on this score. Davis v. State, 29 Ala.App. 421, 198 So. 153, certiorari denied 240 Ala. 160, 198 So. 155; Wilson v. State, Cobb v. Malone, 92 Ala. 630, 9 So. 738. As to the contention that error can be rested upon some erroneous instructi......
  • Taylor v. State, 4 Div. 847.
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 19 d2 Dezembro d2 1944
    ...99, 24 So. 884; Stearns v. State, 4 Ala.App. 154, 58 So. 124; Davis et al v. State, 29 Ala.App. 421, 198 So. 153, certiorari denied 240 Ala. 160, 198 So. 155; Smith v. State, 23 Ala.App. 488, 128 So. certiorari denied 221 Ala. 217, 128 So. 359. The judgment of the lower court is due to be a......
  • Couch v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • 12 d2 Dezembro d2 1944
    ...lower court in refusing to disturb the verdict of the jury. Davis et al. v. State, 29 Ala.App. 421, 198 So. 153, certiorari denied 240 Ala. 160, 198 So. 155; Smith v. State, 23 Ala.App. 488, 128 So. certiorari denied 221 Ala. 217, 128 So. 359; Smith v. State, 21 Ala.App. 460, 109 So. 294. G......
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • 12 d2 Fevereiro d2 1985
    ...returned home at midnight and went to bed. Here, as in Davis v. State, 29 Ala.App. 421, 422, 198 So. 153, cert. denied, 240 Ala. 160, 198 So. 155 (1940), "this so-called newly discovered testimony relates to the question of the alibi of the accused defendants on which subject numerous witne......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT