Davis v. State
| Decision Date | 19 March 1935 |
| Docket Number | 8 Div. 120 |
| Citation | 26 Ala.App. 370,160 So. 266 |
| Parties | DAVIS v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Jackson County; A.E. Hawkins, Judge.
Tom Davis was convicted of distilling and possessing a still, and he appeals.
Reversed and remanded.
Proctor & Snodgrass, of Scottsboro, for appellant.
A.A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The law ought to be consistent. We have reaffirmed our holding in Dickey v. State, 22 Ala.App. 375, 115 So. 848, more than once. See Shepard's Alabama Citations.
There, we held that a conviction such as the instant one could not be sustained upon mere proof of the accused's presence at a still, etc., not on his premises, and that he was seen to catch some of the whisky being manufactured in a bottle, taste it, and run away upon the approach of the officers.
Here, the only way the state would have us sustain the conviction is by testimony tending to show that appellant was present at a still, etc., on premises not his own, and that he carried a rock, or carried some rocks, and deposited it or them near the still. What the rocks were to be used for does not appear, except by pure speculation.
We can easily imagine that this old man (shown to be seventy) is guilty. But the evidence, as we read it, and as we have held in numerous cases, was not sufficient to sustain the verdict of the jury. See Wallace v. State, 25 Ala.App. 334, 145 So. 583, and Dickey v. State, supra.
For the error in overruling appellant's motion to set aside the verdict of the jury, and the judgment entered thereon, the said judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gulf & S. I. R. Co. v. Bond
... ... 834, 83 So. 247; ... Murray v. L. & N. R. R. Co., 168 Miss. 513, 151 So. 913 ... Nothing ... is better settled in this state than that incorrect ... instructions are not cured by correct instructions, and that ... a verdict resting on contradictory and misleadlng ... witness for plaintiffs, Manuel Bond, brother of the deceased, ... testified that he was in a car with the witnesses, Mr. Davis ... and Mr. West, that night, and when they crossed the track he ... saw his brother, Carson Bond, with Bourbon Hughes, standing ... between the ... ...
-
Hudson v. State
... ... enclosure near the still and started stirring some beer ... Woodall ... v. State, 22 Ala.App. 104, 113 So. 85: Defendant in ... close proximity to, was proceeding in the direction of, the ... place where the officers had just destroyed a complete still ... Davis ... v. State, 26 Ala.App. 370, 160 So. 266: Accused was ... present at a still on premises not his own and carried a rock ... or some rocks and deposited it or them near the still ... Mitchell ... v. State, 18 Ala.App. 119, 89 So. 98: Still was found ... 150 or 200 yards from ... ...
-
Garsed v. State
...19 Ala.App. 176, 95 So. 830; Seigler v. State, 19 Ala.App. 135, 95 So. 563; Woodall v. State, 22 Ala.App. 104, 113 So. 85; Davis v. State, 26 Ala.App. 370, 160 So. 266; Mitchell v. State, 18 Ala.App. 119, 89 So. 98; Whited v. State, 22 Ala.App. 492, 117 So. 396; Dickey v. State, 22 Ala.App.......
-
King v. State
...of the trial court to direct a verdict for defendant. The Moon (Moon v. State, 19 Ala.App. 176, 95 So. 830), and Davis (Davis v. State, 26 Ala.App. 370, 160 So. 266) cases are cited as sustaining authority. It is our view, however, that these cases are readily distinguishable from the insta......