Davis v. State
| Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
| Writing for the Court | MORRISON |
| Citation | Davis v. State, 318 S.W.2d 668, 167 Tex.Crim. 109 (Tex. Crim. App. 1958) |
| Decision Date | 12 November 1958 |
| Docket Number | No. 30116,30116 |
| Parties | Les DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
[167 TEXCRIM 109] R. E. Murphy, Coleman, for appellant.
Leon B. Douglas, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
The offense is transporting whiskey in a dry area; the punishment a fine of $250.
Sheriff Fenton testified that as he passed the appellant in his automobile the appellant accelerated the speed of the automobile which he was driving, that the witness gave chase, observed the appellant run through a red light and into a rock wall. Fenton stated that as he approached the appellant's automobile on foot the appellant said, 'You got me,' and at the same time he observed on the floorboard of the appellant's automobile a full pint of whiskey plus another pint containing some whiskey which had the cap removed, and there was whiskey on the floorboard. His testimony was corroborated by that of his deputy.
The appellant did not testify or offer any evidence in his own behalf.
Appellant's sole contention is that it was incumbent upon the State to introduce evidence which would negative the exception contained in Article 666-23a, Vernon's Ann.P.C., which provides that it is lawful to transport intoxicants from 'a place where the sale thereof is legal to a place where the possession thereof is legal.' This Court has heretofore held that it is incumbent upon the appellant to bring himself within such exception. See Brooks v. [167 TEXCRIM 110] State, 154 Tex.Cr.R. 512, 228 S.W.2d 863; Martin v. State,...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Erwin v. State
...best, is conflicting as to appellant's own testimony as to whether the consumption was to be by him or by his employees. Davis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 318 S.W.2d 668; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App. 334 S.W.2d Appellant next complains of the trial court's refusal to require a state's witness t......
-
Cantu Trucking & Materials Co., Inc. v. State
...the requisite elements specified in the two provisos; the burden did not lie upon the State to negative them. Davis v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 109, 318 S.W.2d 668 (1958); Michelle Corp. v. El Paso Retailers Association, 626 S.W.2d 615 (Tex.App.1981, writ ref'd n.r.e.); Holguin v. Villalobos, 2......
-
Michelle Corp. v. El Paso Retailers Ass'n, Inc.
...to criminal cases that it is incumbent upon the defendant to bring himself within the exception to a penal statute. Davis v. State, 167 Tex.Cr.R. 109, 318 S.W.2d 668 (1958). Whether to grant or deny a temporary injunction lies within the sound discretion of the trial Court, and we find no a......
-
Price v. State
...is legal. There being no evidence to raise this issue, the court did not err in failing to give the requested charge. Davis v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 318 S.W.2d 668, and cases there Finding no reversible error, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. ...
-
Section 3.44 Must Conform to State Law
...the two state laws are so repugnant to each other that they cannot be harmonized, the general law yields to the specific law. Turner, 318 S.W.2d at 668; see also O’Flaherty v. State Tax Comm’n of Mo., 680 S.W.2d 153, 154 (Mo. banc 1984); State ex rel. City of Springfield v. Smith, 125 S.W.2......