Davis v. State

• Decision Date: 25 May 1993
• Docket Number: No. A93A0054,A93A0054
• Citation: Davis v. State, 432 S.E.2d 229, 208 Ga.App. 845 (Ga. App. 1993)
• Parties: DAVIS v. The STATE.
• Court: Georgia Court of Appeals

Page 229

432 S.E.2d 229

208 Ga.App. 845

DAVIS v. The STATE.

No. A93A0054.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

May 25, 1993.

Reconsideration Denied June 8, 1993.

Certiorari Denied Oct. 5, 1993.

Virgil L. Brown & Associates, Bentley C. Adams III, Zebulon, for appellant.

W. Fletcher Sams, Dist. Atty., Randall K. Coggin, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

BLACKBURN, Judge.

On October 21, 1988, the appellant was issued a uniform traffic citation charging him with driving under the influence. He was tried and convicted of that offense in the Probate Court of Upson County, and that conviction was upheld on appeal to the Superior Court of Upson County. On November 27, 1990, however, this court reversed the conviction on the grounds that in the probate court the appellant had not waived in writing his right to trial by jury. Davis v. State, 197 Ga.App. 746, 399 S.E.2d 554 (1990). (That holding has since been invalidated by Nicholson v. State, 261 Ga. 197, 403 S.E.2d 42 (1991), in which the Supreme Court held that in the absence of a timely objection to proceeding without a jury, the right to jury trial is waived.)

Upon retrial of the case, the appellant requested a jury trial, and the matter was transferred to the Superior Court of Upson County. Pursuant to OCGA § 40-13-3, the appellant's case could not be tried in the superior court without a formal accusation, and on July 25, 1991, an accusation was filed charging the appellant with the same offense for which he was originally tried and convicted. The appellant then filed a plea in bar, asserting that prosecution of the DUI charge is now barred by the statute of limitation. The trial court denied that plea in bar, and this appeal followed.

The appellant's sole contention is that because the accusation was filed more than two years after the date of the offense, his prosecution is barred by the statute of limitation. In the recent case of State v. Rustin, 208 Ga.App. 431, 430 S.E.2d 765...