Davis v. State, 71-484

Citation254 So.2d 221
Decision Date02 November 1971
Docket NumberNo. 71-484,71-484
PartiesJeff DAVIS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtCourt of Appeal of Florida (US)

Before PEARSON and CHARLES CARROLL, JJ., and LESTER, M. IGNATIUS, Associate Judge.

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellant was charged with robbery and found guilty by a jury. He was sentenced to a ten year term in the state prison. On this appeal appellant's first point urges error upon the refusal of the trial court to give his requested instruction upon the defense of alibi. We hold that the instruction should have been given and that the error was prejudicial. Therefore, we reverse.

Appellant's only defense in the trial court was predicated upon the claim of alibi. In support of his claimed alibi, appellant presented four witnesses. Only one of these, his girlfriend, testified that she was with him at the time that the crime was said to have been committed. Based upon this testimony, appellant requested the court to give the standard jury instruction, Criminal S.J.I. 2.10(a), upon the defense of alibi. The trial judge refused to give the instruction. Error has been assigned and properly argued.

The trial judge should have given the instruction because it is not his function to weigh the evidence and decide whether the charge shall be given in some cases and not in others. The instruction should be given in every case where there is sufficient evidence to take the issue to the jury. Long v. State, 42 Fla. 509, 28 So. 775 (1900); Watson v. State, Fla.App.1967, 200 So.2d 270. Having held that reversible error appears, we do not consider appellant's second point. Accordingly, the judgment and sentence are reversed and this cause is remanded to the trial court for the purpose of granting appellant a new trial.

Reversed and remanded for new trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Palmes v. State, 52045
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • 5 March 1981
    ...of his defense. Florida courts have reversed convictions where juries were not instructed about the defenses of alibi, Davis v. State, 254 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971); Watson v. State, 200 So.2d 270 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967); coercion, Koontz v. State, 204 So.2d 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1967), entrapment......
  • Pulley v. State, 544
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • 14 February 1978
    ...the prevailing rule in the majority of state jurisdictions. 4 See, e. g., Jackson v. State, 374 A.2d 1 (Del.Supr.1977); Davis v. State, 254 So.2d 221 (Fla.App.1971)- ; Hill v. State, 237 Ga. 523, 228 S.E.2d 898 (1976); State v. Simon, 375 S.W.2d 102 (Mo.1964); State v. Searles, 82 N.J.Super......
  • Hudson v. State, 78-1131
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 25 March 1980
    ...The instruction should be given in every case where there is sufficient evidence to take the issue to the jury. Davis v. State, 254 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Adams v. State, 28 Fla. 511, 542, 10 So. 106, 114 (Fla.1891), . . . evidence in support of an alibi need not be absolutely clear.......
  • Arboleda v. State, 94-582
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
    • 26 October 1994
    ...in the record to support it.") (citations omitted); see also McCoy v. State, 493 So.2d 1093 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Davis v. State, 254 So.2d 221 (Fla. 3d DCA 1971). Here, the defendant's testimony directly concerned his intent to traffic in cocaine. This court also previously has noted that t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT