Davis v. State

Decision Date05 September 1979
Docket NumberNo. 58126,58126
CitationDavis v. State, 259 S.E.2d 207, 151 Ga.App. 222 (Ga. App. 1979)
PartiesDAVIS v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

J. Douglas Willix, Atlanta, for appellant.

Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Joseph J. Drolet, Benjamin H. Oehlert, III, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.

CARLEY, Judge.

Davis was convicted of criminal attempt to commit armed robbery, carrying a pistol without a license, and carrying a concealed weapon. After denial of his motion for new trial, Davis appeals and enumerates here as in his motion for new trial only the general grounds.

The state's evidence showed that Davis, along with co-defendant Love, entered the victim's place of business appearing to be prospective customers. When Love sought to purchase a soft drink, the victim took Love's money and, as he proceeded to the cash register to make change, both defendants approached him. Hearing one of the defendants state, "This is it," the victim looked up to see a gun in the hands of Davis. Reacting with indignation rather than fear, the victim successfully took the weapon from Davis and fired at Davis and Love, at which time both defendants attempted to exit the victim's premises and were apprehended in an alley adjacent to the victim's place of business.

Although Davis did not testify, he relied upon evidence offered by Love depicting a scenario wherein the victim was engaged in illegal gambling with the defendants entering the victim's establishment solely for the purpose of collecting a winning lottery ticket. On this basis, defendants sought to convince the jury that the victim was the aggressor. However, the guilty verdict indicates that the jury was unpersuaded; and this verdict must be upheld if there was evidence supporting the state's version of the occurrence. Harris v. State, 149 Ga.App. 374, 254 S.E.2d 518 (1979); Walker v. State, 146 Ga.App. 555, 246 S.E.2d 737 (1978); Bethay v. State, 235 Ga. 371...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
13 cases
  • Griffin v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 8, 1980
    ...grounds, is restricted to determining if there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury." Davis v. State, 151 Ga.App. 222, 223, 259 S.E.2d 207, 208 (1979). The evidence here is clearly sufficient to support the verdict and our view of the record compels our conclusion that ......
  • Causey v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 29, 1980
    ...court is restricted to determining whether or not there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict of guilty. Davis v. State, 151 Ga.App. 222, 223, 259 S.E.2d 207 (1979); Kendrick v. State, 146 Ga.App. 513, 246 S.E.2d 505 (1978). The evidence introduced with all reasonable deductions and......
  • Redd v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 18, 1980
    ...and analyze the evidence, an appellate court is restricted to a determination of the sufficiency of the evidence. Davis v. State, 151 Ga.App. 222, 223, 259 S.E.2d 207 (1979). The evidence here is clearly sufficient to support the verdict and our review of the entire record compels our concl......
  • Mathis v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 1980
    ...general grounds, is restricted to determining if there is sufficient evidence to support the verdict of the jury." Davis v. State, 151 Ga.App. 222, 223, 259 S.E.2d 207 (1979). After conviction, the evidence in the record is reviewed on appeal in the light most favorable to the state. Jones ......
  • Get Started for Free