Davis v. Thomas County, Georgia

Decision Date26 June 1967
Docket NumberNo. 23882.,23882.
Citation380 F.2d 93
PartiesJasper C. DAVIS et al., Appellants, v. THOMAS COUNTY, GEORGIA et al., Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit

A. J. Whitehurst, III, Thomasville, Ga., for appellants.

William P. Trotter, LaGrange, Ga., Charles F. Johnson, of Altman & Johnson, E. P. McCollum, Sol Altman, Thomasville, Ga., for appellees.

Before GEWIN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges, and LYNNE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Contending that the method of election of the eight members of the Board of Commissioners of Roads and Revenues of Thomas County provided by an act of the Georgia Legislature in 1911 (1911 Ga. Laws, p. 501), as amended in 1917 (1917 Ga.Laws, p. 394), constituted a violation of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment within the principles articulated in Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 83 S.Ct. 801, 9 L.Ed.2d 821 (1963) and nurtured in Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1, 84 S.Ct. 526, 11 L.Ed.2d 481 (1964), appellants, resident citizens of District No. 1 (Thomasville), filed their complaint for a declaratory judgment that such enactments are unconstitutional.

The thrust of their complaint is that although the present statute requires the election of all eight commissioners, with staggered terms, by the electorate of the county at large, the residence requirements set forth therein result in the representation of District No. 1, with a population of 20,492, by two commissioners, while the remaining four districts with a population of 13,827, are represented by six. This, they insist, amounts to invidious discrimination as a matter of law.

Being of the opinion that the complaint did not meet the test of Reed v. Mann, 237 F.Supp. 22 (N.D.Ga.1964), the district court sustained the motion to dismiss filed in behalf of defendants. This result is clearly vindicated by the opinion of the Supreme Court in Dusch v. Davis, 387 U.S. 112, 87 S.Ct. 1554, 18 L.Ed.2d 656 (May 22, 1967), which is dispositive of this appeal. The judgment is

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Reese v. Dallas County, Alabama
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 30, 1974
    ...III); id., N.D.Miss., 1973, 361 F.Supp. 603 (Leflore II); id., N.D.Miss., 1973, 351 F.Supp. 848 (Leflore I). In Davis v. Thomas County, 5 Cir., 1967, 380 F.2d 93, decided one month after Dusch v. Davis, supra, a panel of this Court upheld an at-large election-- subdistrict residency plan in......
  • Thomasville Branch of Nat. Ass'n for Advancement of Colored People v. Thomas County, Georgia
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 29, 1978
    ...was not an adequate basis for a constitutional attack and the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed, Davis v. Thomas County, Georgia, et al., 380 F.2d 93 (1967). In the case now under consideration a group of black citizens contend that the system results in invidious discriminati......
  • Lytle v. Commissioners of Election of Union County, Civ. A. No. 74-237. Civ. A. No. 74-281.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of South Carolina
    • May 15, 1974
    ...identical to the cases here under review; two of these cases, Mayes v. Teague, 341 F.Supp. 254 (E. D.Tenn., 1972), and Davis v. Thomas County, 380 F.2d 93 (5 Cir., 1967), support the argument advanced by the defendants, while the third case, Keller v. Gilliam, 454 F.2d 55 (5 Cir., 1972), su......
  • Breault v. Feigenholtz
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • July 23, 1967
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT