Davis v. United States
Decision Date | 23 May 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 980,980 |
Citation | 384 U.S. 953,86 S.Ct. 1567,16 L.Ed.2d 549 |
Parties | Joe DAVIS, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Martin Garbus, for petitioner.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Robert S. Erdahl and Marshall T. Golding, for the United States.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied. Dissenting opinion by Mr. Justice Stewart:
'The petitioner stands convicted for sending two allegedly obscene phonograph records through the mail.1 One of the records consists almost entirely of the sounds of percussion instruments. Its title 'Erotica,' is a gross misnomer. The second record is a transcription of passages from 'Songs of Bilitis,' a book of poems published by Pierre Louys in 1894. Pierre Louys was a French poet and novelist who lived from 1870 to 1925. The Columbia Dictionary of Modern European Literature2 says that his poems * * *'
Mr. Justice DOUGLAS joins this dissent, adding that he would also reverse on the basis of his separate opinions in Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463, 86 S.Ct. 942, 16 L.Ed. 31, and A Book Named 'John Cleland's Memoirs of a Woman of Pleasure' v. Attorney General of Com. of Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 86 S.Ct. 975, 16 L.Ed.2d 1. Mr. Justice BLACK would also grant certiorari and reverse the judgment.
1 He was also convicted for mailing non-obscene circulars advertising these records for sale. If the records are not obscene, the convictions on these advertising counts obviously cannot stand. Five additional counts involve the label of a third record, pasted on the outside of its mailing wrapper. This record was not even alleged to be obscene.
2 Columbia Univ. Press, N.Y., 1947.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
West v. State
...not required. United States v. Wild, supra; United States v. Davis, 353 F.2d 614 (2d Cir. 1965), cert. denied, 384 U.S. 953, 86 S.Ct. 1567, 16 L.Ed.2d 549 (1966); Kahn v. United States, supra; United States v. Womack, We also hold that the sequential representation of overt sexual conduct i......
-
School Committee of Springfield v. Board of Ed.
... ... Sawyer v. Davis, 136 Mass. 239 (1884). State v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co., 18 How. 421, 15 L.Ed. 435 (1855) ... plan adopted for Boston, see Boston III, 15 had since been incorporated in a decree of the United States District Court, District of Massachusetts, as the necessary short-term remedy for violations ... ...
-
People v. Kirkpatrick
...'Exclusive', D.C., 253 F.Supp. 485, 493 (1966) 13; United States v. Davis, 353 F.2d 614, 615 (2d Cir., 1965), cert. den. 384 U.S. 953, 86 S.Ct. 1567, 16 L.Ed.2d 549; People v. Finkelstein, 11 N.Y.2d 300, 306--307, 229 N.Y.S.2d 367, 371--373, 183 N.E.2d 661, 664--665 (1962) Having come thus ......
-
People v. Pinkus, Cr. A
...369 U.S. 859, 82 S.Ct. 949, 8 L.Ed.2d 18; United States v. Davis (2d Cir., 1965), supra, 353 F.2d 614, 615, cert. den. 384 U.S. 953, 86 S.Ct. 1567, 16 L.Ed.2d 549; Womack v. United States (1961) 111 U.S.App.D.C. 8, 294 F.2d 204, 205; cf. People v. Moskovitz (1967) CR A 7293, tsfr. den. by C......