Davis Wright & Jones v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
| Decision Date | 19 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-35255,89-35255 |
| Citation | 897 F.2d 1021 |
| Parties | DAVIS WRIGHT & JONES, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Bradley D. Stam, Culp, Dwyer, Guterson, & Grader, Seattle, Wash., for defendant-appellant.
Arthur W. Harrigan, Danielson, Harrigan, Smith & Tollesson, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Barbara Rothstein, District Judge, Presiding.
Before KOELSCH, ALARCON and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
The court AFFIRMS for the reasons set forth in the district court's order. Davis Wright & Jones v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 709 F.Supp. 196 (W.D. Wash. 1989).
To continue reading
Request your trial
15 cases
-
Pulte Home Corp. v. TIG Ins. Co.
...suit. See, e.g., Davis Wright & Jones v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 709 F.Supp. 196, 199 (W.D. Wash. 1989), aff'd 897 F.2d 1021 (9th Cir. 1990). And importantly, Pulte cites no California authority applying this rule in the context of issue, rather than claim, preclusion.Accor......
-
U.S. v. Saunders
... ... Miles Davis SAUNDERS, Defendant-Appellant ... No. 91-3841 ... at 294-95, 93 S.Ct. at 1045-46; Jones v. Berry, 880 F.2d 670, 673 (2d Cir.1989) ... ...
- U.S. v. Aichele
-
Ford v. New Mexico Dept. of Public Safety
...1333, 1341 (N.D.Ill.1986); Davis Wright & Jones v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., 709 F.Supp. 196, 202 (W.D.Wash.1989), aff'd, 897 F.2d 1021 (9th Cir.1990). Given this authority and the sound policy underlying it, we recognize Section 51 as accurately expressing New Mexico law. In any event,......
Request a trial to view additional results