Davock v. Moore
Decision Date | 26 April 1895 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Parties | DAVOCK ET AL. v. MOORE, CONTROLLER. |
Certiorari to circuit court, Wayne county; Robert E. Frazer, Judge.
Action upon the relation of Harlow P. Davock and others against Charles W. Moore, controller, for writ of mandamus to compel defendant to issue his warrant for the payment of a check issued by the board of health. There was judgment for issuance of the writ, which defendants now bring up by writ of certiorari for review. Affirmed.
Atkinson & Haigh (John Atkinson, H. H. Hatch, and John Miner, of counsel), for appellant.
John J Speed (John D. Conely, of counsel), for appellees.
At the present session the legislature passed an act entitled "An act to establish a board of health for the city of Detroit." The act was approved by the governor, February 27, 1895, and took immediate effect. Under that act the board is to consist of four members, freeholders and electors, of the city of Detroit, to be appointed by the governor of this state, with the advice and consent of the senate. The members of the board of health so appointed by the governor at once entered upon their duties as a board of health. This act repealed all former acts providing for a board of health in the city of Detroit, and made it the duty of such former board to turn over to the new board all the property records, and offices, hospitals and assets, of every name and nature, then in its possession or control, and the new board to pay the bills of the former board. Section 3 of the act provides:
It appears that about $1,600 of bills of the old board remained unpaid at the time that the new board entered upon its duties, and that there were no funds in the city treasury belonging to this board of health fund, said fund having been fully exhausted by warrants theretofore drawn. The legislature thereupon passed an act entitled "An act to amend sections two and four of chapter four, section fifty-nine of chapter seven, sections one, six, seven and eight of chapter ten, and section twenty-seven of chapter eleven of an act entitled, 'An act to provide a charter for the city of Detroit and to repeal all acts and parts of acts in conflict therewith, approved June 7, 1883."' This act was approved March 15, 1895, and took immediate effect. Section 27 of that act, as amended, reads as follows:
On March 18th the pay roll of the board was made up and approved by the board of health, and a check in the following form drawn in favor of the secretary of the board: This check was presented to the controller, the respondent here, and he was requested to draw his warrant on the city treasurer as provided by law for the payment of the check. The controller refused to draw the warrant, claiming that there were no funds, and that it was unlawful for him to draw his warrant as requested, though his attention was called to the amendment of the charter passed March 15, 1895.
It appears that the city treasurer informed the board that if the circuit court should direct the controller to draw his warrant upon the public health fund he would pay the same as provided by section 27 of the charter above quoted. The board thereafter presented a petition for mandamus to the Wayne circuit court to compel the controller to issue his warrant for the payment of this check. In his answer to show cause to that petition, the controller answered substantially that he had been advised by counsel that these statutes were in contravention of the constitution and void and that in view of such advice he deemed it not safe or proper to draw his warrant. He further returns that all the moneys and funds in the treasury of the city, or under the control of the city treasurer, were raised and appropriated to the several funds required by law before the approval of the board of health act of February 27, 1895; that all said funds were appropriated for purposes other than the support and maintenance of the board of health created by that act; that the fund known before that time as the "board of health fund" was exhausted, and he was informed and believed that there was no money or funds in the custody or possession of the treasurer available for the support and maintenance of the board, or upon which he could...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wolverine Golf Club v. Hare
...1961, p. 2927. 22 For definition of 'session days' see Smith v. Attorney General (1911), 165 Mich. 140, 130 N.W. 557; Davock v. Moore (1895), 105 Mich. 120, 63 N.W. 424; and OAG 1963--1964, No. 4329, p. 494 (November 3, 23 Coincidentally it was the same proposal which resulted in reducing t......
-
Davock v. Moore
...105 Mich. 12063 N.W. 424DAVOCK ET AL.v.MOORE, CONTROLLER.Supreme Court of Michigan.April 26, 1895. Certiorari to circuit court, Wayne county; Robert E. Frazer, Judge. Action upon the relation of Harlow P. Davock and others against Charles W. Moore, controller, for writ of mandamus to compel......