Dean v. Younell Aministrator
Decision Date | 01 December 1868 |
Citation | 75 U.S. 14,8 Wall. 14,19 L.Ed. 365 |
Parties | DEAN v. YOUNELL'S AMINISTRATOR |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
A bill had been filed below to set aside a deed of land for fraud and inadequate consideration. The allegations of fraud were founded wholly upon the circumstance, that the land was sold for Confederate notes. The bill set up also a lien in favor of the vendor of the complainant. The vendor, whose lien was set up, was not made a party, nor was there any allegation of notice to the grantor of the complainant of the alleged lien for purchase-money; nor was there any averment that the commplainant was induced to take the Confederate notes by fraudulent misrepresentations of the decedent. A demurrer was inter posed in the court below (Erskine, J., presiding), and being sustained, the bill was dismissed.
The CHIEF JUSTICE delivered the opinion of this court, to the effect, that the vendor whose lien was set up not having been made a party, and there not being any allegations of notice to the grantor of the complainant, of the alleged lien for purchase-money, no ground of relief was shown by the bill as to this lien.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Whittaker v. Sw. Va. Improvement Co. * (Holt
...2 I red. 365; Jarm. Wills 52; 84 Am. Dec. 97; Shelf. Sun. 37; 20 Gratt. 147; 15 Am. Dec. 354; 11 W. Ya. 584; 21 Gratt, 75; 22 Gratt. 894; 8 Wall. 14; 3 Pom. Eq. Jur. § 928 et seq.; 2 Loin. Eq. Jur. § 917 and notes. P. W. Strother for appellee cited: Unis v. Charleston, 12 Gratt,; Pant v. Mi......
-
Richie v. Frazer
...Cockrill v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Mo. 697; Alsop v. Goodwin, 1 Roote, (Conn.) 196; Thorington v. Smith, 75 U.S. 1, 8 Wall. 1, 19 L.Ed. 361, 19 L.Ed. 365; Cole Hundley, 16 Miss. 473, 8 Sm. & M., 473-478; 2 Parsons on Notes and Bills (2d Ed. ), pp. 501, 506-508, and cases cited. Judgment affirmed. ...
-
Cullins v. Overton
...of de facto governments are legal and binding, are the following additional authorities: Thorington v Smith, 8 Wall 1, 19 L. Ed. 361, 19 L. Ed. 365: U. S. v Rice, 4 Wheat. 246, 4 L. Ed. 562; Fleming v. Page, 9 How. 603; Sprott v. U. S. 20 Wall. 459, 22 L. Ed. 371; U. S. v. Insurance Co., 22......
- The Eagle