Deason v. State, 3 Div. 826

CourtAlabama Court of Criminal Appeals
Writing for the CourtPER CURIAM
CitationDeason v. State, 363 So.2d 1006 (Ala. Crim. App. 1978)
Decision Date31 October 1978
Docket Number3 Div. 826
PartiesJackie DEASON v. STATE.

After remandment by the Supreme Court of Alabama, REVERSED AND REMANDED on authority of the opinion of the Supreme Court of Alabama, 77-457, September 8, 1978, 363 So.2d 1001.

PER CURIAM.

No opinion.

All the Judges concur.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Bowden v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1988
    ... ... knowledge of relationship, is required under Code of 1975, § 13A-13-3, defining the crime of incest. The intent exception is simply not ... 's most recent recognition of that line of authority was in Ex parte Deason, 363 So.2d 1001 (Ala.1978), which was reaffirmed but distinguished in Ex ... ...
  • Ex parte King
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • March 21, 1997
    ...of the counts was proper. As to Count III, the State does not dispute that unless this Court overrules settled caselaw, see Deason v. State, 363 So.2d 1001 (Ala.1978), the Court of Criminal correctly held that the trial court should have directed the state to make an election. In Deason, th......
  • King v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 19, 1996
    ... ... King being sixteen years of age or older, in violation of § 13A-6-63(a)(3) of the Code of Alabama, ...         "a male, being sixteen years ...         "In Deason v. State, 363 So.2d 1001 (Ala.1978), the Alabama Supreme Court condemned ... ...
  • Slater v. State, CR-92-1453
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
    • October 21, 1994
    ... ... As this court has stated: ...         "In Deason v. State, 363 So.2d 1001 (Ala.1978), the Alabama Supreme Court condemned ... ...
  • Get Started for Free