Deckard v. State

CourtIndiana Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtARTERBURN; JACKSON
CitationDeckard v. State, 170 N.E.2d 424, 241 Ind. 338 (Ind. 1960)
Decision Date21 November 1960
Docket NumberNo. 29993,29993
PartiesRalph E. DECKARD, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.

Mellen & Mellen, Bedford, for appellant.

Edwin K. Steers, Atty. Gen., Patrick D. Sullivan, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

ARTERBURN, Judge.

The petitioner here has asked that we grant him a belated appeal. Previously, in Deckard v. State, Ind.1960, 166 N.E.2d 170, petitioner sought to appeal from a conviction of the crime of reckless homicide. In that case the appeal was dismissed for the reason that there was no prompt application for a writ of certiorari to correct the record after it was pointed out that the judgment was omitted, although reference to the judgment was made in the assignment of errors and other pleadings. The law of this case was fixed by the opinion in that case.

The petitioner now applies to this court for a belated appeal, stating that the time limitation for the appeal ran out because of an error and mistake in the time calculations made by his attorney. Such error and mistake is not sufficient grounds for a belated appeal. Were it otherwise, Rule 2-2 of this court fixing the time for appeals could be easily circumvented upon a mere affidavit of the character here and such time limitation would become meaningless.

We point out further that a belated appeal may not be granted except upon a showing that there is meritorious grounds therefor. General conclusions to that effect are not sufficient, nor are mere statements without more, that the court erred in making certain rulings. Burns' § 9-3305, 1956 Repl.; Preble v. State, Ind.1959, 163 N.E.2d 32; Harrell v. State, Ind.1959, 157 N.E.2d 581; Harr v. State, 1958, ...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • State v. Foy
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • March 19, 2007
    ...cases addressing former Ind. Supreme Court Rule 2-2. See, e.g., Eggers v. Wright, 253 Ind. 44, 245 N.E.2d 331 (1969); Deckard v. State, 241 Ind. 338, 170 N.E.2d 424 (1961); Barker v. State, 242 Ind. 5, 175 N.E.2d 353 (1961). Former Supreme Court R. 2-2, however, is not sufficiently analogou......
  • Eggers v. Wright
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 12, 1969
    ...of the attorney are not sufficient grounds for a belated appeal. Barker v. State, supra (242 Ind. 5, 175 N.E.2d 353); Deckard v. State, supra (241 Ind. 338, 170 N.E.2d 424). Were it otherwise, the time limitation of Rule 2--2 of the Rules of the Supreme Court would be meaningless. Appellant......
  • Victor v. State, 30786
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 9, 1966
    ...ex rel. Casey v. Murray (1952), 231 Ind. 74, 106 N.E.2d 911; Kirkland v. State (1956), 235 Ind. 450, 134 N.E.2d 223; Deckard v. State (1960), 241 Ind. 338, 170 N.E.2d 424; Barker v. State (1961), 242 Ind. 5, 175 N.E.2d We do not believe that the petition filed in this case contains either s......
  • Johnson v. State, 30923
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • March 22, 1966
    ...v. Murray, 1952, 231 Ind. 74, 77, 106 N.E.2d 911.' Barker v. State (1961), 242 Ind. 5, 6, 175 N.E.2d 353. See also Deckard v. State (1961), 241 Ind. 338, 170 N.E.2d 424. It is well established that miscalculations and mistakes on the part of the attorney are not sufficient grounds for a bel......
  • Get Started for Free