Deep Sea Tankers v. The Long Branch, Docket 24439-42.

Decision Date14 March 1957
Docket NumberDocket 24439-42.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
PartiesDEEP SEA TANKERS, Limited, in its own behalf, as owner of the S/T Rincon Hills, and as bailee of the cargo laden thereon, and Shell Oil Company, Incorporated, as charterer of said vessel, Libellants-Appellants, v. THE LONG BRANCH, the Railway Carfloats Nos. 61 and 56, Central Railroad Company of New Jersey, the steamtugs Ajax and Bjax, the sand barges A, B and C, and Metropolitan Sand & Gravel Corporation, Respondents-Appellees. Matter of the Petition of the CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, as owner of The Long Branch for exoneration from or limitation of liability. Matter of the Petition of the CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, as owner of the carfloat known and designated as THE CRR of NJ No. 56, for exoneration from or limitation of liability. Matter of the Petition of the CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, as owner of the carfloat known and designated as THE CRR of NJ No. 61, for exoneration from or limitation of liability. THE RINCON HILLS. THE AJAX. THE BJAX. THE A, B and C. THE CRR OF NJ NOS. 56 and 61.

Haight, Gardner, Poor & Havens, New York City, for libellants-appellants.

Macklin, Speer, Hanan & McKernan, New York City, for respondent-appellees.

Vincent E. McGowan, New York City (Gerald J. McKernan, New York City, of counsel), for Central R. Co. of New Jersey.

Before MEDINA and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges, and GALSTON, District Judge.

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

These consolidated cases were tried before Judge Goddard March 11 to June 10, 1955, inclusive. At the conclusion of the trial it was ordered that briefs and all exhibits, together with the transcript of the testimony, be filed by October 3, 1955, oral arguments to be heard later. Judge Goddard died on August 26, 1955.

Thereafter certain holographic notes made by Judge Goddard during the trial, containing observations and comments relative to the demeanor and credibility of some of the witnesses and other matters, were discovered and placed in the file envelope in the Clerk's Office.

After some preliminaries it was finally stipulated by the parties that the consolidated cases be submitted to Judge Clancy for determination "on the record made at the trial."

The appendix to the brief for libellants-appellants herein includes photostatic copies of Judge Goddard's holographic notes and references thereto are made in the brief in...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Deep Sea Tankers v. The Long Branch
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • July 14, 1958
    ...formed no part of the trial record stipulated to be considered by Judge Clancy and hence are not part of the record now before us. 2 Cir., 242 F.2d 433. Since the opinion and findings below are based upon the cold record alone, without the benefit of seeing and hearing the numerous witnesse......
  • Exner Sand & Gravel Corp. v. PETTERSON LIGHTER. & TOW. CORP.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of New York
    • April 23, 1957
    ...the advantage of seeing and hearing Captain Ageton testify and I am, therefore, obliged, as stated by Judge Medina in Deep Sea Tanker, Limited v. The Long Branch, 2 Cir., 242 F.2d 433, 434, to "decide all questions, including those related to the credibility of witnesses, from the cold reco......
  • Carriers v. Am. S.S. Owners Mut. Prot. & Indem. Ass'n, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • January 8, 2015
    ...no entitlement to review [magistrate judge's] . . . personal notes" in connection with evidentiary hearing); Deep Sea Tankers v. The Long Branch, 242 F.2d 433, 434 (2d Cir.1957) (deceased trial judge's handwritten notes are not part of the record for purposes of review upon motion for rever......
  • United States v. Taylor, Case No. 1:04-CR-160-1
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee
    • August 31, 2011
    ...10 to suggest that Defendant is entitled to discover the Court's notes or email correspondence. See e.g., Deep Sea Tankers v. the Long Branch, 242 F.2d 433, 434 (2d Cir. 1957). Accordingly, the Court will DENY this request. C. Written Communications from Jurors Regarding Individual Circumst......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT