Dehan v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees And Beverage Dispensers, Local Union No. 183

Decision Date08 March 1935
Docket Number4811
Citation159 So. 637
CourtCourt of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US
PartiesDEHAN et al. v. HOTEL AND RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES AND BEVERAGE DISPENSERS, LOCAL UNION NO. 183, et al

Thos W. Robertson, of Shreveport, for appellant.

Hardin & Coleman, T. Overton Brooks, and Pike Hall, all of Shreveport, for appellee Central Trades & Labor Council.

OPINION

DREW Judge.

Plaintiffs, for a cause of action, filed the following petition:

"The petition of Mrs. H. Dehan, John Dehan, Edward Dehan and Julia Dehan, respectfully shows:

"1. That they are residents of Shreveport, Caddo Parish, Louisiana.

"2. That they are the owners and operators of the Majestic Cafe, located on Milam Street, Shreveport, Caddo Parish, Louisiana, which business they have owned and operated for a number of years, and which is a thriving restaurant business in said city.

"3. That the Cooks & Waiters Local No. 183 or Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Beverage Dispensers Local Union No. 183, is an unincorporated voluntary association domiciled in the city of Shreveport and is a union organization of organized labor, of which Lawrence Galloway is the president of the local union, and that the Central Trades & Labor Council is an unincorporated voluntary association domiciled in the city of Shreveport, of which John Howatt is president.

"4. That your petitioners operate their said business in a legal manner and as a high-class restaurant should be operated, and are paying and have always paid the prevailing wage scale paid by the restaurant industry generally in Shreveport.

"5. That within the last few weeks the Cooks & Waiters and other employees of restaurants in Shreveport have organized a local union, No. 183, and are endeavoring to compel your petitioners and other restaurant owners and operators to pay a higher wage scale than heretofore paid, and a wage scale which your petitioners cannot pay and successfully operate their said business.

"6. That your petitioners have complied with the Restaurant Code of the National Recovery Administration and are paying the scale of wages required thereby, which is higher than the scale of wages previously paid by them, and are making the deduction of $ 3.00 per week for meals from the wages of said employees under said Act, as is permitted by the Restaurant Code and as they have always done prior to June 16, 1933, and as was the prevailing custom prior to said date, which was the date of the inauguration of said Restaurant Code, and your petitioners are in every way endeavoring to comply with said Code.

"7. That your petitioners are perfectly willing to employ members of the local cooks and waiters union and have never objected to any of their employees being members of said union, but they are unwilling and unable to be coerced into paying wages which are more than their business justifies them in paying, and as a result two of their employees have recently left their employ who were members of the local Cooks and Waiters Union.

"8. That your petitioners have no objection to the employment of union labor, provided they will accept employment at the wage that petitioners can afford to pay and they have never declined to employ or discharged anyone because of his affiliation with any organization of organized labor, and that they are not unfair to organized labor, but on the contrary, have done everything within their power to be fair to it in their dealings with labor and in all other respects.

"9. That they are helping to maintain a living wage for those who labor for them, and are paying the wages prescribed in the Restaurant Code of the National Recovery Administration.

"10. That, notwithstanding these facts, the officers and members of the Cooks & Waiters Local No. 183 or Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Beverage Dispensers Local Union No. 183 and the Central Trades and Labor Council began, without any cause whatever, on Friday, December 1, 1933, and have continued since that date an organized boycotting and picketing of their said place of business on Milam Street in the city of Shreveport, and are engaging in the following unlawful practices: that they constantly maintain on the sidewalk directly in front of their place of business two or more persons who stop and hand out to every passerby on the sidewalk, circulars, reading as follows:

" "Stop and Read.

N. R.A. (Emblem) We do our Part.

Are you willing to help maintain a living wage for those who labor?

If so, patronize those who help support it.

The Majestic Cafe Does Not, and is Unfair to Organized Labor.

The Cooks & Waiters Local No. 183, solicits your support and patronage for better workmanship and living wages.

Sponsored by Central Trades & Labor Council, Affiliated With American Federation of Labor.'

"Copy of which circular is hereto attached and made a part hereof which said pickets endeavor by every means possible to dissuade patrons and customers of their said restaurant from entering and patronizing the same.

"11. That the said Cooks & Waiters Local No. 183 or the Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Beverage Dispensers, Local Union No. 183, and the said Central Trades and Labor Council, also constantly maintain in front of your petitioners' place of business on the sidewalk a long tandem bicycle, bearing a large sign in conspicuous letters reading substantially the same as the circular above quoted.

"12. That the avowed purpose of the picketing and boycotting of their said place of business and of the distribution of said circulars and of the maintenance of said sign is to harass your petitioners and prevent customers from entering and patronizing their place of business, and to destroy their business and all profit therefrom, and to coerce your petitioners into adopting the union scale of wages and to annoy, embarrass, and humiliate the patrons, and would-be patrons, and customers of your petitioners who have always patronized your petitioners and who would continue to do so, but for the maintenance of the illegal picketing, boycotting and placarding of their said place of business, as above set out.

"13. That the effects of the acts of the said parties have been to seriously curtail and destroy the business of your petitioners, since the pickets maintain a clock system by which they check the number of customers who they divert from your petitioners' place of business, and the result of their said illegal acts are shown in the fact that between the hours of 11 A. M. to 2 P. M. on Saturday, December 2d, 142 less customers entered their place than entered between the same hours on Friday December 1st, and that on Sunday, December 3rd, 102 fewer customers entered their place than entered it prior to the picketing of their said place of business.

"14. That the said members of the said Cooks & Waiters Local No. 183 and Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Beverage Dispensers Local Union No. 183 and the members of the Central Trades and Labor Council are so engaging in said acts unlawfully and wilfully and maliciously and with the deliberate intent to injure and destroy your petitioners' property and business, which consists of their right legally to earn a living in the operation of the restaurant business in the city of Shreveport, and that by reason of said practices the defendants are now and have been continuously since December 1, 1933, unlawfully, wilfully and maliciously intimidating persons who desired to enter your petitioners' business for the purpose of patronizing and purchasing meals from your petitioners, which said acts are deterring and have deterred such persons from entering and patronizing your petitioners' place of business and are calculated and intended to give notice and does give notice to all persons passing petitioners' place of business, or intending to patronize the same, that the said place of business is under boycott, and that its patronage is opposed by organized labor, and as a result of the presence of said pickets and of the unlawful, wilful and malicious maintenance of said picket patrol, and of said placard, and of the distribution of said circulars and of the implied threats, and intimidation, as aforesaid, by the defendants, a great many of your petitioners' patrons have been intimidated and as a consequence have discontinued to patronize and will continue to do so as long as the said pickets and placards are maintained in front of petitioners' place of business and as long as the boycott continues, reducing the daily receipts of petitioners' place of business by the sum of least $ 50.00 per day, and that your petitioners' property is injured and destroyed to that extent by the said acts of said defendants herein.

"15. That the said officers and members of the Cooks and Waiters Local No. 183 and Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Beverage Dispensers, Local Union No. 183, and the Central Trades and Labor Council threaten to continue their said unlawful, wilful and malicious acts and conduct and are so continuing at the present time.

"16. That the said acts of said defendants hereinabove set forth not only constitute illegal acts themselves and an unlawful denial of the right of petitioners to conduct their business and engage in a livelihood, but also constitute a combination on defendants' part of an unlawful agreement in restraint of trade or commerce in the State of Louisiana, such as is expressly declared to be illegal by the Statutes of Louisiana, and that your petitioners have both implied and express rights to relief by injunction against said acts.

"17. That the said acts on the part of said defendants have caused and are causing your petitioners irreparable injury, as it is impossible to ascertain the exact amount of loss which they are causing to your petitioners,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Shively v. Garage Employees Local Union No. 44
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1940
    ... ... 857, ... 81 L.Ed. 1229; Dehan v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, ... ...
  • Stephenson v. New Orleans & N. E. R. Co.
    • United States
    • Mississippi Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1937
    ... ... to enjoin upon the carriers and their employees the duty ... "to exert every reasonable effort ... 62 F.2d 20; Estes v. Union Terminal Co., 89 F.2d 768 ... It is ... Theatres v. Hattiesburg Local, 174 Miss. 439, 164 ... So. 887, involved the ... 327; 10 ... R. C. L., sec. 132; Dehan v. Hotel & Restaurant ... Employees, 159 So ... 132; ... Cocks v. Simmons, 57 Miss. 183; Fiche v. R. E ... Householder Co., 98 Fla ... ...
  • Reid v. Indep. Union of All Workers
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • September 24, 1937
    ...284, certiorari denied, 293 U.S. 595, 55 S.Ct. 110, 79 L.Ed. 688;Dehan v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, etc., Local Union (La.App.) 159 So. 637;Cinderella Theater Co. v. Sign Writers' Local Union (D.C.) 6 F.Supp. 164;American Furniture Co. v. I. B. of T. C. and H. of A., etc., 222 Wis. 38......
  • Reid v. Independent Union of All Workers, 31192.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • September 24, 1937
    ...Co. v. Morrin (C.C.A.) 71 F.(2d) 284, certiorari denied, 293 U.S. 595, 55 S.Ct. 110, 79 L.Ed. 688; Dehan v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees, etc., Local Union (La.App.) 159 So. 637; Cinderella Theater Co. v. Sign Writers' Local Union (D.C.) 6 F.Supp. 164; American Furniture Co. v. I. B. of T......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT