DeHart v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc.
Decision Date | 19 February 1988 |
Citation | 527 So.2d 136 |
Parties | Gene DeHART v. IDEAL BASIC INDUSTRIES, INC. Civ. 5996. |
Court | Alabama Court of Civil Appeals |
Stephen J. Flynn of Flynn & Huey, Mobile, for appellant.
Marion R. Vickers, Jr., of Vickers, Riis, Murray and Curran, Mobile, for appellee.
This is a workmen's compensation case.
After a trial on the merits, the trial court found that the employee had sustained a permanent partial disability and had suffered a fifteen percent permanent loss of his ability to earn.
The employee appeals, and we affirm.
The employee contends that his loss in earning capacity is greater than that determined by the trial court.
The dispositive issue, therefore, is whether there is any evidence to support the trial court's finding that the employee's earning capacity had been reduced by only fifteen percent as a result of the injury caused by his work-related accident.
In Grumm v. Neptune Meter Co., 472 So.2d 1067, 1068-69 (Ala.Civ.App.1985), we stated the following with respect to the appropriate standard of review in workmen's compensation cases:
After a review of the record, we find that there is evidence to support the trial court's conclusion that the employee suffered a fifteen percent loss in his ability to earn.
The record shows that the employee suffered an injury to his back while in the course of his employment as a millwright that is, in this instance, one who does heavy machine repair. He was approximately fifty-two years old at the time of the accident and had worked as a millwright for several different companies since 1957. When he suffered an injury to his back while moving a heavy metal plate on or about December 28, 1983, he had been doing heavy machine repair for that employer for approximately two years. Before his injury he was earning in the neighborhood of $650 per week.
The record supports the employee's assertion that he immediately reported his injury to his superior, but he did not seek medical assistance until February 14, 1984, when he visited a chiropractor who diagnosed his condition as follows:
(Emphasis supplied).
That chiropractor took the employee off work as a result of the above diagnosis and engaged in conservative treatment of the employee until he discharged him to return to work on March 16, 1984. The chiropractor reported that the discharge was upon the employee's request to return to work, even though the chiropractor did not think he was completely healed as of that date.
The employee returned to work, but continued to have pain and went to see an orthopedic surgeon on March 23, 1984. That doctor diagnosed the employee's condition as being symptomatic of "bulging discs" at two places in his spine. He also testified pertinently as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Madison Acad., Inc. v. Hanvey
...caused temporary injury but that permanent back problems related solely to employee's obesity ); and DeHart v. Ideal Basic Indus., Inc., 527 So.2d 136, 138–39 (Ala.Civ.App.1988) (trial court did not err in awarding only 15% permanent-partial-disability benefits based on expert medical evide......
-
Landers v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
...accident compels a finding of loss of earning capacity commensurate with the postinjury wages. See generally DeHart v. Ideal Basic Indus., Inc., 527 So.2d 136 (Ala.Civ.App.1988) (although employee earned 84% less after injury, trial court did not err in awarding 15% permanent-partial-disabi......
-
Alamo v. Pch Hotels and Resorts, Inc.
...condition only if the work-related accident permanently contributes to that condition and disability. See DeHart v. Ideal Basic Indus., Inc., 527 So.2d 136, 138-39 (Ala.Civ.App.1988) (trial court did not err in awarding only 15% permanent-partial-disability benefits based on expert medical ......
-
Patterson v. Clarke County Motors, Inc.
...is presented, the findings of the trial court will be conclusive if there is any testimony to support them. DeHart v. Ideal Basic Industries, Inc., 527 So.2d 136 (Ala.Civ.App.1988). Clarke is correct in asserting that an employee must meet two tests of causation--legal and medical--to estab......
-
When the Bough Breaks: Federal and Washington State Indian Child Welfare Law and Its Application
...may be provided by expert witnesses who do not possess special knowledge of Indian life.") 128. Tucker, 710 P.2d at 799. 129. Long, 527 So. 2d at 136. 130. Tucker, 710 P.2d at 131. 25 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (1988). 132. Id. 133. Id. § 1915(b). 134. 44 Fed. Reg. 67,594 (1979); see also Navajo Trib......