DeKalb County v. McFarland
Decision Date | 09 March 1967 |
Docket Number | No. 23918,23918 |
Citation | 223 Ga. 196,154 S.E.2d 203 |
Parties | DeKALB COUNTY v. Martin McFARLAND et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court
1. A general demurrer goes to the whole pleading to which it is addressed and should be overruled if any part thereof is good in substance.
2. The plaintiff's petition states a cause of action for legal relief and is sufficient as against a general demurrer.
George P. Dillard, Harbert O. Edwards, Robert E. Mozley, Decatur, for appellant.
Martin McFarland, Murphy, McFarland & Turoff, Atlanta, for appellees.
The sole question raised by this appeal is whether or not the appellee's two count petition seeking legal and equitable relief is subject to the appellant's general demurrer.
In a two count petition with Count 1 against DeKalb County and its Board of County Commissioners and with Count 2 against the county, its commissioners, the City of Decatur and its commissioners, Martin McFarland sought to recover a money judgment for damages done to his improved real estate abutting Midway Road; to enjoin the defendants 'from allowing any waters to be unnaturally diverted from' Midway Road and unnaturally diverted onto the plaintiff's land; and to enjoin the defendants from allowing a continuing nuisance to exist. Plaintiff alleged that he is the owner of the improved property abutting Midway Road, a public road, with the portion complained of being partially within the confines of DeKalb County and partially within the City of Decatur and that within four years preceding the filing of the suit, 'DeKalb County, through its governing authorities, constructed said spillway on the north side of Midway Road, a distance of thirty-six feet easterly from plaintiff's property. That said spillway is a width of approximately four and one-half feet wide. That the spillway is so constructed that it goes downhill and is designed to empty unnaturally diverted waters from Midway Road into a ditch along a frontal portion of plaintiff's lot. That said ditch goes underneath plaintiff's concrete driveway which leads from his carport, and then said ditch proceeds in a westerly direction across the frontal portion of plaintiff's lot. That as the said ditch continues along the frontal portion of the lot, the same then gradually spreads out into an eroded area caused by said diverted waters on plaintiff's front yard and leads into Shoal Creek which flood waters unlawfully traverse plaintiff's lot.
Plaintiff also alleged that the county had constructed a ditch on the south side of Midway Road and culvert under the road, causing surface water to flow over and under the road flooding his property. Plaintiff enumerated specific days within the twelve months preceding the filing of his claim in which his land had been damaged by flood waters from ordinary rainfalls. Plaintiff contended the county had violated his rights under Art. I Sec. III Par. I of the Georgia Constitution in that it had damaged his land and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Department of Transportation v. Mixon
...case that least fits this category was overruled in an earlier stage of the McFarland litigation. See DeKalb County v. McFarland , 223 Ga. 196, 201 (2), 154 S.E.2d 203 (1967) ("If our ruling in this case is contrary to what was held in [Fincher ], the rule made in that case was not by a ful......
-
Miree v. United States
...which a county may be sued in nuisance. In both Nalley v. Carroll County, 135 Ga. 835, 70 S.E. 788 (1911), and DeKalb County v. McFarland, 223 Ga. 196, 154 S.E.2d 203 (1967),8 counties were held liable for flood damage caused by a county public works project. Neither case, however, made cle......
-
Miree v. U.S.
...citizens for public purposes, the county is liable. Nalley v. Carroll County, 135 Ga. 835, 70 S.E. 788 (1910); DeKalb County v. McFarland, 223 Ga. 196, 154 S.E.2d 203 (1967); Baranan v. Fulton County, 232 Ga. 852, 209 S.E.2d 188 (1974); Fulton County v. Baranan, 240 Ga. 837, 242 S.E.2d 617 ......
-
City of Columbus v. Myszka
...231 Ga. 649, 651, 203 S.E.2d 495 (1974); McFarland v. DeKalb County, 224 Ga. 618, 163 S.E.2d 827 (1968); DeKalb County v. McFarland, 223 Ga. 196, 154 S.E.2d 203 (1967); Baranan v. Fulton County, 232 Ga. 852, 209 S.E.2d 188 (1974); Turk v. City of Rome, 133 Ga.App. 886, 212 S.E.2d 459 (1975)......