Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Reagan, 18-15845

Citation911 F.3d 942 (Mem)
Decision Date02 January 2019
Docket NumberNo. 18-15845,18-15845
Parties The DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE; DSCC, AKA Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee; the Arizona Democratic Party, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michele REAGAN, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona; Mark Brnovich, Attorney General, in His Official Capacity as Arizona Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees, The Arizona Republican Party; Bill Gates, Councilman; Suzanne Klapp, Councilwoman; Debbie Lesko, Sen.; Tony Rivero, Rep., Intervenor-Defendants-Appellees.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)

911 F.3d 942 (Mem)

The DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE; DSCC, AKA Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee; the Arizona Democratic Party, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Michele REAGAN, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of State of Arizona; Mark Brnovich, Attorney General, in His Official Capacity as Arizona Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees,

The Arizona Republican Party; Bill Gates, Councilman; Suzanne Klapp, Councilwoman; Debbie Lesko, Sen.; Tony Rivero, Rep., Intervenor-Defendants-Appellees.

No. 18-15845

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

FILED JANUARY 2, 2019


ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judge McKeown did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Hobbs
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • January 27, 2020
    ...active judges voted to rehear this case en banc, and we vacated the decision of the three-judge panel. Democratic Nat’l Comm. v. Reagan , 911 F.3d 942 (9th Cir. 2019). We review the district court’s conclusions of law de novo and its findings of fact for clear error. Gonzalez v. Arizona , 6......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT