Denise H. v. Arizona Dept. of Economic Sec., 2

• Court: Court of Appeals of Arizona
• Writing for the Court: ESPINOSA; BRAMMER, P.J., and HOWARD
• Citation: 972 P.2d 241,193 Ariz. 257
• Parties: , 285 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3 DENISE H., Appellant, v. ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, Omar S., Ryan S., David S., and Andy R., Appellees. 97-0067.
• Docket Number: No. 2,CA-JV,2
• Decision Date: 15 December 1998

Page 241

972 P.2d 241 193 Ariz. 257, 285 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3 DENISE H., Appellant,
v.
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC SECURITY, Omar S., Ryan S., David S., and Andy R., Appellees. No. 2 CA-JV 97-0067. Court of Appeals of Arizona,
Division 2, Department B. Dec. 15, 1998.

Page 242

Karen M. Hayden, Tucson, for Appellant.

Terry J. Dalke, Tucson, for Appellee Natural Father.

Grant Woods, The Attorney General, By Sara S. Wisdom, Tucson, Attorneys for Appellee Arizona Department of Economic Security.

AFFIRMED

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶1 The mother of three boys, born June 24, 1982, January 20, 1988, and April 16, 1989, appeals from the juvenile court's order terminating her parental rights. Counsel has filed a brief seeking to have this court review the record for fundamental error pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and State v. Leon, 104 Ariz. 297, 451 P.2d 878 (1969). We decline to do so and affirm the court's order severing the mother's rights.

¶2 Each of the boys has a different father. The children were removed from the mother's home in December 1994 after her boyfriend hit the youngest child on the hand with a board with a nail in it. The removal followed a previous referral in which the oldest child, then twelve, had been found caring for six other children, the youngest of whom was fourteen months, and had no idea how to reach his mother in the event of an emergency. The children were adjudicated dependent in February 1995, and this court affirmed that adjudication in August 1995. Cochise County Juvenile Dependency Action No. MD94000070, 2 CA-JV 95-0016 (memorandum decision filed August 3, 1995). ¹ The mother continued to live with her boyfriend despite his serious alcohol problem, failed to complete case plan requirements, and lost her visitation rights in 1996 because she did not comply with the rules for visitation established by the case manager and the court. A psychologist who evaluated the mother testified that she suffers from a personality disorder not otherwise specified, with immature, narcissistic, dependent, and codependent features.

¶3 The state filed a petition to terminate the mother's rights to the two older boys in July 1996. The father of the youngest boy, who was awarded physical custody of the child in January 1995 and legal custody in January 1996, filed a separate petition to

Page 243

terminate the mother's rights to that boy; the two petitions were later consolidated. After five days of hearings, the juvenile court granted both petitions, entering lengthy, detailed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The court concluded that grounds existed to terminate the mother's rights to all three boys based on mental illness, A.R.S. § 8-533(B)(3), and out-of-home placement, § 8-533(B)(7)(a), and on the ground of abandonment as to the youngest boy. § 8-533(B)(1).

¶4 Counsel argues that a severance proceeding and a criminal proceeding are sufficiently similar that Anders and Leon should apply to the appeal of a severance order. Specifically, she contends that, because the Equal Protection Clause of the United States Constitution requires juveniles adjudicated delinquent to be treated the same as adults convicted of crimes insofar as filing Anders appeals are concerned, it should require the same treatment for parents whose rights have been terminated. Counsel arrives at this conclusion by noting that the right to custody and control of a child has been held to be a fundamental constitutional right. See,...