Denke-Walter v. Loeper

Decision Date10 December 1895
Docket Number17,428
Citation42 N.E. 358,142 Ind. 657
PartiesDenke-Walter v. Loeper et al
CourtIndiana Supreme Court

From the Marion Superior Court.

The appeal is dismissed.

Herod & Herod, for appellant.

W. A. Ketcham, for appellees.

OPINION

Monks, J.

Ida M. Loeper, one of appellees, brought this action against her co-appellees and appellant to quiet title to real estate.

Cross-complaints were filed by certain of the appellees to quiet title to a part of the same real estate.

The cause was tried and judgment rendered quieting the title to said real estate, as prayed for in the complaint and in the cross-complaint. Judgment was also rendered against appellants, Mary C. Denke-Walter and Frederick W. Denke-Walter (who is made an appellee in this court) for costs.

It is settled law in this State that all joint-judgment defendants in the court below must be made co-appellants in this court in all vacation appeals or the appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Acts 1895, p. 179; Elliott App. Proced., section 144; Inman v. Vogel, 141 Ind. 138, 40 N.E. 665, and cases cited; Walsh v. Brockway, 13 Ind.App. 70, 40 N.E. 29.

There can be but one appeal from the same judgment, and when the same is not a term time appeal all co-parties entitled to appeal must be joined as co-appellants. Acts 1895, p. 179; Inman v. Vogel, supra; Gregory v. Smith, 139 Ind. 48, 38 N.E. 395, and cases cited.

The appeal in this case was not a term time appeal and is not therefore governed by the provisions of the acts approved March 9, 1895. Acts 1895, p. 179.

Frederick W. Denke-Walter was a co-party and joint-judgment defendant with appellant in the court below, and should have been made co-appellant in this court. This not having been done the appeal must be dismissed. Gregory v. Smith, supra; Inman v. Vogel, supra, and cases cited; Midland R. W. Co. v. St. Clair, 144 Ind. 363, 42 N.E. 214.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Everett v. Fouts
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 17 May 1901
    ...Ind. 472, 39 N. E. 160;Inman v. Vogel, 141 Ind. 138, 40 N. E. 665;Vordermark v. Wilkinson, 142 Ind. 142, 39 N. E. 441;Denkewalter v. Loeper, 142 Ind. 657, 42 N. E. 358;Lee v. Mozingo, 143 Ind. 667, 41 N. E. 454;Shuman v. Collis, 144 Ind. 333, 43 N. E. 257;Railway Co. v. St. Clair, 144 Ind. ......
  • Cont'l Ins. Co. v. Gue
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 18 April 1912
    ...340;Roach v. Baker, 145 Ind. 330, 43 N. E. 932, 44 N. E. 303;Midland Ry. Co. v. St. Clair, 144 Ind. 363, 42 N. E. 214;Denke-Walter v. Loeper, 142 Ind. 657, 42 N. E. 358;Lilly v. Somerville, 142 Ind. 298, 40 N. E. 1088;Inman v. Vogle, 141 Ind. 138, 40 N. E. 665;Wood v. Clites, 140 Ind. 474, ......
  • Continental Insurance Company v. Gue
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • 18 April 1912
    ... ... Baker ... (1896), 145 Ind. 330, 43 N.E. 932, 44 N.E. 303; Midland ... R. Co. v. St. Clair (1896), 144 Ind. 363, 42 ... N.E. 214; Denke-Walter v. Loeper (1895), ... 142 Ind. 657, 42 N.E. 358; Lilly v ... Somerville (1895), 142 Ind. 298, 40 N.E. 1088; ... Inman v. Vogel (1895), 141 Ind ... ...
  • Owen v. Dresback
    • United States
    • Indiana Supreme Court
    • 26 January 1900
    ... ... 472, ... 39 N.E. 160; Inman v. Vogel, 141 Ind. 138, ... 40 N.E. 665; Vordermark v. Wilkinson, 142 ... Ind. 142, 39 N.E. 441; Denke-Walter v ... Loeper, 142 Ind. 657, 42 N.E. 358; Lee v ... Mozingo, 143 Ind. 667, 41 N.E. 454; Shuman ... v. Collis, 144 Ind. 333, 43 N.E. 257; Midland ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT