Dennis v. State

Decision Date15 April 1957
Docket NumberNo. 159,159
Citation213 Md. 115,131 A.2d 285
PartiesBertha T. DENNIS v. STATE of Maryland.
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

John L. Sanford, Jr., Berlin (Thomas F. Johnson, Snow Hill, on the brief), for appellant.

Clayton A. Dietrich, Asst. Atty. Gen. (C. Ferdinand Sybert, Atty. Gen., Stedman Prescott, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen., and Daniel T. Prettyman, State's Atty., Worcester County, Snow Hill, on the brief), for appellee.

Before BRUNE, C. J., and COLLINS, HENDERSON, HAMMOND and PRESCOTT, JJ.

COLLINS, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction and fine of $50 and costs.

The defendant, appellant, and the State, appellee, entered into a stipulation, the essential parts of which follow.On April 30, 1956, a warrant was issued by a trial magistrate of Worcester County, Maryland, charging Bertha T. Dennis'with having on the 28th day of April, 1956 allowed a minor under the age of twenty-one years to loaf and loiter about the place of business for which a license to sell alcoholic beverages is issued, to wit, the 'High Hat' contrary to the Act of Assembly in such case made and provided and against the peace, government and dignity of the State.'The defendant appeared before the trial magistrate on June 20, 1956, and requested a jury trial.This was granted, bond was given, and the aforesaid warrant, with a certified copy of the docket entries, and the bond were transmitted by the trial magistrate to the Circuit Court for Worcester County.On October 18, 1956, the case was called for trial in that court.The defendant, through her attorneys, filed a motion to dismiss said warrant for the reason that it did not state an offense against the laws of the State of Maryland.After argument by counsel, the State's Attorney requested orally to amend the warrant by inserting after the words 'High Hat', the following: 'The said Bertha T. Dennis being then and there the holder of a Class D, Beer and Wine License #75, authorizing her to sell beer and wine on the premises known as the High Hat Casino, situate R.F.D. #2, Hollygrove Road, Berlin, Worcester County, Maryland.'The trial court granted the State's motion to amend the warrant over the objection of the defendant.The traverser plead not guilty, elected a jury trial, and a verdict of guilty was rendered.On October 18, 1956, she was fined as aforesaid, and appeals here.

The defendant was tried for violation of Code 1951, Article 2B, Section 124(c), which provides: 'It shall be unlawful for any licensee under this Article to allow any minor or minors under the age of twenty-one years to loaf or loiter about the place of business for which such license is issued restaurants may, however, serve meals without alcoholic beverages to minors.'As above set forth the original warrant did not state that the defendant was the holder of a license for the premises.The State admits that the warrant as originally drawn was defective.

By Code 1951, Article 52, Section 20, originally enacted as Chapter 444 of...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
5 cases
  • Gray v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • April 25, 1958
    ...also informed the defendant that he was not one of the 'excepted' persons referred to in the statute. The case of Dennis v. State, 1957, 213 Md. 115, 131 A.2d 285; is directly in point. Where a violation of the same section of the Code is charged both before and after the amendment, it is n......
  • Thanos v. State
    • United States
    • Maryland Court of Appeals
    • June 7, 1978
    ...in Gray to support its holding in any way suggest that the amendment in this instance would be permissible. See Dennis v. State, 213 Md. 115, 117-19, 131 A.2d 285, 286-87 (1957); Laque v. State, 207 Md. 242, 247-49, 113 A.2d 893, 895-96, cert. denied, 350 U.S. 863, 76 S.Ct. 105, 100 L.Ed. 7......
  • Gyant v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • June 21, 1974
    ...to matters of substance except by the grand jury which presented it, unless specifically authorized by statute.' See Dennis v. State, 213 Md. 115, 131 A.2d 285. Thus, at this stage in the history of authority in this State to amend charging documents, the criterion for amending indictments ......
  • In re J.T.
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 11, 2023
    ... ...          Contention ...          That ... the juvenile court erroneously allowed the State to amend the ... juvenile petition to change the identity of the robbery ... victim without J.T.'s consent ... at any time before the commencement of the trial." ... See also Dennis v. State, 213 Md. 115, 131 ... A.2d 285 (1957); Gray v. State, 216 Md. 410, 140 ... A.2d 643 (1958) ...          In the ... ...
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT