Dennison v. Alexander
| Decision Date | 01 October 1880 |
| Citation | 26 L.Ed. 313,103 U.S. 522 |
| Parties | DENNISON v. ALEXANDER |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia.
Alexander, on the fifth day of January, 1875, filed his bill in the court below against Dennison and others, commissioners of the District of Columbia, and the First National Bank, to restrain the sale of real estate in the city of Washington which the commissioners had advertised to satisfy the amount due for improvements made by the board of public works. The certificate of indebtedness issued by that board and transferred to the bank, was for less than $400 and more than $100. A perpetual injunction was awarded and an appeal allowed by a justice of this court.
Mr. Albert G. Riddle for the appellant.
Mr. Joseph J. Stewart for the appellee.
We think this case is governed by Railroad Company v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398. In that case we held that the act of Feb. 25, 1879, c. 99, sects. 4, 5 (20 Stat. 320), took away our right to hear and determine cases from the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia where the matter in dispute did not exceed $2,500, and that it operated on pending cases which had been brought here under the provisions of sect. 847 of the Revised Statutes relating to the District. This case came here under sect. 848, which provided for the allowance of appeals and writs of error by the justices of this court under certain circumstances, when the matter in dispute was less than $1,000, the then general jurisdictional amount, but exceeded $100. There is no reservation in the repealing act as to this class of pending cases any more than the other. Both sections have reference to the same general subject-matter, that is to say, our review of the judgments and decrees of the Supreme Court of the District in cases where jurisdiction has been made to depend on the value of the matter in dispute. Under the act of 1879 we can no longer hear any of that class of cases, unless the amount exceeds $2,500.
Appeal dismissed, each party to pay his own costs.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Texas Farm Bureau Cotton Ass'n v. Lennox
...Ex parte McCardle, 7 Wall. (74 U. S.) 506, 19 L. Ed. 264; Railway Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398, 25 L. Ed. 231; Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U. S. 522, 26 L. Ed. 313; Stewart v. Lattner, 53 Tex. Civ. App. 330, 116 S. W. 860; 25 R. C. L. p. 936; 1 Lewis' Sutherland, Stat. Con. (2d Ed.) p. 557. In......
-
In re Schneider. No. ____
...13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 109; Cross v. U. S., 145 U. S. 571, 12 Sup. Ct. Rep. 842. See, also, Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398; Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U. S. 522; U. S. v. Wanamaker, 147 U. S. 149, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 279. ...
-
Theo. Poull & Co. v. Foy-Hays Const. Co.
... ... the remedy, and is not a vested right. Elliott's App ... Proc. § 76; B. & P. R. R. Co. v. Grant, 98 U.S. 398, ... 25 L.Ed. 231; Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U.S. 522, ... 26 L.Ed. 313; McClain v. Williams, 10 S.D. 332, 73 ... N.W. 72, 43 L. R. A. 287, 289; Smith v. Packard, 12 ... ...
-
United States Trask v. Wanamaker
...special circumstances, are no longer in force. Act Feb. 25, 1879, c. 99, (20 St. p. 320;) Railroad Co. v. Grant, 98 U. S. 398; Dennison v. Alexander, 103 U. S. 522; Act March 3, 1885, c. 355, (23 St. p. 443;) Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, 87, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. The sum in dispute on this reco......