Denver Post Corp. v. Ritter
| Docket Number | 10SC94 |
| Decision Date | 20 June 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
91 cases
-
People v. Graves
...the General Assembly intended paragraph (d) likewise to proscribe only overtly sexualized conduct in public. See Denver Post Corp. v. Ritter, 255 P.3d 1083, 1091 (Colo.2011) ("To give effect to this phrase according to its plain and ordinary meaning, we interpret the word in the context of ......
-
BKP, Inc. v. Killmer, Lane & Newman, LLP
...disfavor, id. , and we review decisions to grant them de novo, applying the same standards as the trial court, Denver Post Corp. v. Ritter , 255 P.3d 1083, 1088 (Colo. 2011). ¶ 9 When deciding whether to grant a motion to dismiss, a trial court must accept all the allegations of material fa......
-
Core-Mark Midcontinent, Inc. v. Sonitrol Corp.
...the statute is not ambiguous, we enforce it as written and do not resort to other rules of statutory construction. Denver Post Corp. v. Ritter, 255 P.3d 1083, 1089 (Colo.2011); Carruthers v. Carrier Access Corp., 251 P.3d 1199, 1203 (Colo.App.2010). ¶ 44 Section 13–21–111.5 addresses pro ra......
-
Landmark Towers Ass'n, Inc. v. Umb Bank, N.A.
...and the associated levies. We won't expand the reach of the statute beyond the plain meaning of its language. See Denver Post Corp. v. Ritter , 255 P.3d 1083, 1089 (Colo. 2011) (if statutory language is clear, we apply the statute as written); Spahmer v. Gullette , 113 P.3d 158, 162 (Colo. ......
Request a trial to view additional results