Dep't of Def. v. Am. Civil Liberties Union
| Decision Date | 30 November 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 09–160.,09–160. |
| Citation | 175 L.Ed.2d 508,558 U.S. 1042,130 S.Ct. 777 (Mem) |
| Parties | DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, et al., petitioners, v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Section 565 of the Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 2010, and the certification by the Secretary of Defense pursuant to that provision.
Justice SOTOMAYOR took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
To continue reading
Request your trial
20 cases
-
Knight First Amendment Inst. at Columbia Univ. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland Sec., 1:17-cv-7572 (ALC)
...construed. Am. Civil Liberties Union v. Dep't of Def. , 543 F.3d 59, 66 (2d Cir. 2008), vacated on other grounds, 558 U.S. 1042, 130 S. Ct. 777, 175 L. Ed. 2d 508 (2009). "[A] district court must review de novo an agency's determination to withhold information requested under the FOIA." Flo......
-
Democratic Party of Wis. v. Wis. Dep't of Justice
...as to render the images meaningless,’ the court ordered those photographs to be withheld"), vacated on other grounds558 U.S. 1042, 130 S.Ct. 777, 175 L.Ed.2d 508 (noting intervening change in federal law); Harwood v. McDonough, 344 Ill.App.3d 242, 279 Ill.Dec. 56, 799 N.E.2d 859, 866–70 (20......
-
Greenpeace, Inc. v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.
...Fuentes Decl. Ex. E, at 3 (citing ACLU v. Dep't of Def. , 543 F.3d 59, 71 (2d Cir. 2008), vacated on other grounds , 558 U.S. 1042, 130 S.Ct. 777, 175 L.Ed.2d 508 (2009) ); Hind Decl. Ex. E, at 3. On September 27, 2013, while Greenpeace awaited a decision on its administrative appeal, NPPD ......
-
N.Y. Times Co. v. U.S. Dep't of Justice
...in favor of disclosure.” ACLU v. Dep't of Def., 543 F.3d 59, 66 (2d Cir.2008), vacated on other grounds and remanded,––– U.S. ––––, 130 S.Ct. 777, 175 L.Ed.2d 508 (2009). Courts review exemption claims de novo, and it is the Government's burden “to justify the withholding of any requested d......
Request a trial to view additional results