Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. B. (In re J. B.), A161125

Decision Date23 February 2017
Docket NumberA161125
Citation389 P.3d 409 (Mem),283 Or.App. 907
Parties In the Matter of J. B., a Child. DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Petitioner-Respondent, v. A. B., Appellant.
CourtOregon Court of Appeals

Shannon Storey, Chief Defender, Juvenile Appellate Section, and Sarah Peterson, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the briefs for appellant.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Lauren P. Robertson, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Duncan, Presiding Judge, and DeVore, Judge, and Garrett, Judge.

PER CURIAM

In this dependency case, mother appeals the juvenile court's judgment assuming jurisdiction over her son, J. While the appeal was pending, the juvenile court dismissed jurisdiction and terminated wardship over J. The Department of Human Services argues that the appeal is therefore moot. Mother disagrees, arguing that she continues to suffer collateral consequences from the existence of the jurisdictional judgment, notwithstanding the dismissal of jurisdiction.

A written discussion of the competing arguments would not assist the parties, bench, or bar. After reviewing the record and arguments, we are not persuaded that the circumstances establish the kind of collateral consequences that prevent this appeal from being moot.

Mother also argues that we should consider her appeal under ORS 14.175, because it is capable of repetition yet evading review. Assuming, without deciding, that the issues mother raised might otherwise satisfy the criteria set forth in ORS 14.175, we decline to exercise our discretion to reach those issues in this case.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as moot.

Appeal dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Dep't of Human Servs. v. A. B. (In re J. B.)
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • February 8, 2018
    ...we conclude that the department met that burden. The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. Dept. of Human Services v. A. B. , 283 Or.App. 907, 389 P.3d 409 (2017).FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORYWe take the facts from the uncontested juvenile court records and the express findings of th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT