Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of University of California
| Docket Number | 18-587 |
| Decision Date | 18 June 2020 |
In 2012, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which allows certain unauthorized aliens who arrived in the U.S. as children to apply for a two-year forbearance of removal to become eligible for work authorization and various federal benefits. Two years later, a related program, Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA), proposed to make 4.3 million parents of U.S. citizens or lawful permanent residents eligible for the same forbearance, work eligibility...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
574 cases
-
U.S. Small Bus. Admin. v. Roman Catholic Church of the Archdiocese of Santa Fe
... ... Small Bus. Admin. , 345 F. Supp. 4, 7 (C.D. Cal. 1972) ). It then directs the Court to recent ... non-action here is significant." Bob Jones Univ. v. United States , 461 U.S. 574, 600, 103 S.Ct ... SEC v. Chenery Corp. , 318 U.S. 80, 87, 63 S.Ct ... See Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. , ––– ... ...
-
Nekrilov v. City of Jersey City
... ... ); see also In re Burlington Coat Factory Sec. Litig. , 114 F.3d 1410, 1426 (3d Cir. 1997) ; ... also assert that Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of ... ...
-
Pulido v. Cuccinelli
... ... Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, and Donald Neufeld, Associate Director ... Regents of the University of California , ––– U.S ... Georgetown Univ. Hosp. , 488 U.S. 204, 208, 109 S.Ct. 468, 102 ... ...
-
People v. Vivar
... 11 Cal.5th 510 485 P.3d 425 278 Cal.Rptr.3d 2 The ... (See Dep't of Homeland Security v. Regents of the Univ. of California ... ...
Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
-
Five Ways the Biden Administration Could Rescind or Reverse the Trump Administration’s Regulatory Actions
...until they could be amended or repealed. Courts retain discretion to 4FCC v. Fox TV Stations, Inc., 556 U.S. 502, 515 (2009). 5Id. 6 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1913 (2020). 7Id. 8 139 S. Ct. 2551, 2575 (2019). 9Id. at 2575-2576.5 FOLEYHOAG.COMFive Ways the Biden Administration Could Rescind or Revers......
-
State Attorneys General and the Upcoming Biden Administration
...[11] See Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 [12] Id. at 140 S. Ct. at 1935. [13] Id. at 1909 (quotation marks and citations omitted). [14] The position of CFPB Director was originally insulated from presidential (or congressional) oversight in that the o......
-
President Trump Redux ' Potential Impacts On The Immigration Landscape
...at: https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/document/data/Active_DACA_Recipients_March_FY23_qtr2.pdf. 2 DHS v. Regents of the University of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020). 3 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Final Rule, US Citizenship and Immigration Services (Aug. 30, 2022), ava......
-
Immigration Article of the Day: The DACA decision: Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California and its implications by Brian Wolfman
...rid of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, failed before the Supreme Court in Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California, 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1896 (2020). In this essay — based on a presentation given to an American Bar Association section in Septem......
Get Started for Free
59 books & journal articles
-
Shaping Immigration Policy Through Federal Courts
...Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 401 U.S. 402, 416 (1971).18. See, e.g., DHS v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1907 (2020) (challenge to agency decision to terminate the DACA program not barred by § 1252(b)(9) because that provision is a "targeted" and "narr......
-
Review of the Year 2021 in Family Law: Getting Back to Normal
...here did not satisfy strict scrutiny. 13 3. Id. at 1754. 4. Id. at 1737. 5. Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1901, 1903, 1906 (2020). 6. Id. at 1907–15. 7. Id. at 1916; 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). 8. June Med. Servs. v. Russo, 140 S. Ct. 2103, 2113 (2020) (......
-
Review of the Year 2020 in Family Law: COVID-19, Zoom, and Family Law in a Pandemic
...here did not satisfy strict scrutiny. 13 3. Id. at 1754. 4. Id. at 1737. 5. Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1901, 1903, 1906 (2020). 6. Id. at 1907–15. 7. Id. at 1916; 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). 8. June Med. Servs. v. Russo, 140 S. Ct. 2103, 2113 (2020) (......
-
Disparate Limbo: How Administrative Law Erased Antidiscrimination.
...opinion by Chief Justice Roberts hinged on arbitrary-and-capricious review. Dep't of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891, 1898-99 (2020). For a longer discussion of the role the APA played in Roberts' decision, and the ways in which the decision can be characteriz......
Get Started for Free