Department of Transp. v. James, No. 79-2247

• Court: Florida District Court of Appeals
• Writing for the Court: GLICKSTEIN
• Citation: 403 So.2d 1066
• Parties: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant, v. William F. JAMES, Appellee.
• Docket Number: No. 79-2247
• Decision Date: 09 September 1981

Page 1066

403 So.2d 1066 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellant,
v.
William F. JAMES, Appellee. No. 79-2247. District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District. Sept. 9, 1981.

Page 1067

H. Reynolds Sampson, Gen. Counsel Dept. of Transp., Margaret-Ray Kemper, Appellate Atty., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert Woolfork, Executive Director and Burton M. Michaels, Tallahassee, for appellee, Career Service Commission.

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal by the Department of Transportation from a decision of the Career Service Commission as to the Department's employee, appellee William F. James. We reverse.

On May 12, 1979, appellee James was traveling from Fort Lauderdale to Clearwater in a Department vehicle. En route and while on official business he stopped twice and consumed alcoholic beverages. At the hearing on his appeal to the Career Service Commission, appellee admitted to three or four drinks at the first stop and one drink at the second. Near Bartow, while traveling 65 miles per hour, appellee was involved in a serious accident when another motor vehicle turned in front of him. The Department vehicle was demolished and three persons, one of whom was appellee, were injured. Investigation of the accident revealed appellee's blood alcohol level to be an unlawful 0.19 per cent.

Appellee was suspended for thirty days pending completion of the investigation of the accident, and on April 27, 1979, was dismissed effective April 30, 1979. He appealed his dismissal to the Career Service Commission on May 9, 1979, which, in its order filed September 26, 1979, sustained appellee's dismissal from the position of Public Transportation Specialist I, but ordered the Department to offer appellee the next available position, not requiring travel, for which he is qualified.

The Department contends the Commission was without authority to require the Department to offer appellee the next available position, not requiring travel, for which he is qualified. The Career Service Commission argues in support of its decision that it derived its authority from Florida Administrative Code Rule 22A-10.07(2). That paragraph of the rule, which has not been altered since the date of the accident, provides that after hearing, the Commission shall:

(2) Issue a written order which may sustain, reverse, or alter the decision of the employing agency. The orders of the Career Service Commission may include, but not be limited to, the reinstatement of an...