DeSean v. Sanger
| Decision Date | 08 February 2023 |
| Docket Number | No. 101330-2 |
| Citation | DeSean v. Sanger, 200 Wash.2d 1026, 523 P.3d 1184(Table) (Wash. 2023) |
| Parties | Carmella DESEAN, Petitioner, v. Isaiah SANGER, Respondent. |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
ORDER
For the Court
CHIEF JUSTICE
¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice González and Justices Madsen, Stephens, Yu, and Whitener, considered at its February 7, 2023, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶3 That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).
/s/ González, C.J.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
3 cases
-
DeSean v. Sanger
...P.3d 434 (quoting Nelson , 197 Wash. App. at 456, 387 P.3d 1158 ).¶14 DeSean sought our review, which was granted.3 DeSean v. Sanger , 200 Wash.2d 1026, 523 P.3d 1184 (2023). ISSUE¶15 Is a respondent to a SAPO based on nonconsensual sexual penetration entitled to present the affirmative def......
-
DeSean v. Sanger
...SAPO respondents. Id. at 476 (quoting Nelson, 197 Wn. App. at 456). ¶14 DeSean sought our review, which was granted.3 DeSean v. Sanger, 200 Wn.2d 1026, 523 P.3d 1184 (2023). ISSUE ¶15 Is a respondent to a SAPO based on nonconsensual sexual penetration entitled to present the affirmative def......
- Dep't of Labor & Indus. v. Fowler