Desist v. United States Kaiser v. New York

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
CitationDesist v. United States Kaiser v. New York, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.Ct. 1048, 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969)
Decision Date24 March 1969
Docket NumberNos. 12 and 62,s. 12 and 62
PartiesSamuel DESIST et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES. Thomas R. KAISER, Petitioner, v. NEW YORK

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
56 cases
  • Weaver v. O'GRADY
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Ohio
    • October 27, 1972
    ...S.Ct. 1160, 28 L.Ed.2d 404 (1971); Hill v. California, 401 U.S. 797, 91 S.Ct. 1106, 28 L.Ed.2d 484 (1971); Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.Ct. 1048, 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969), its underlying policies are fully applicable to civil cases as well. See Great Northern R. Co. v. Sunburst ......
  • Shea v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — First Circuit
    • September 28, 2020
    ...new rule. Yates v. Aiken, 484 U.S. 211, 216, 108 S.Ct. 534, 98 L.Ed.2d 546 (1988) (quoting Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 263, 89 S.Ct. 1048, 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969) (Harlan, J., dissenting)). In other words, our timeliness analysis under § 2255(f)(3) will overlap with the merits of S......
  • Chevron Oil Company v. Huson 8212 11
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • December 6, 1971
    ...401 U.S. 667, 91 S.Ct. 1160, 28 L.Ed.2d 404; Hill v. California, 401 U.S. 797, 91 S.Ct. 1106, 28 L.Ed.2d 484; Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.Ct. 1048, 22 L.Ed.2d 248; Linkletter v. Walker, 381 U.S. 618, 85 S.Ct. 1731, 14 L.Ed.2d 601. But the problem is by no means limited to th......
  • Mullreed v. Kropp
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • May 4, 1970
    ...395 U.S. 701, 89 S.Ct. 1897, 23 L.Ed. 647; Jenkins v. Delaware, 395 U.S. 213, 89 S.Ct. 1677, 23 L.Ed.2d 253; Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 89 S.Ct. 1048, 22 L.Ed.2d 248; Fuller v. Alaska, 393 U.S. 81; Berger v. California, 393 U.S. 314, 89 S.Ct. 540, 21 L. Ed.2d 508; McConnell v. R......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • The Path of Constitutional Law Suplemmentary Materials
    • January 1, 2007
    ...v. Winnebago County Dep't of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189, 109 S.Ct. 998, 103 L.Ed.2d 249 (1989), 1289-90 Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 69 S.Ct. 1030, 22 L.Ed.2d 248 (1969), Detroit Trust Co. v. The Barlum, 293 U.S. 21, 56 S.Ct. 31, 79 L.Ed. 176 (1934), 746 Detwiler, United States......
  • Retroactive Adjudication.
    • United States
    • Yale Law Journal Vol. 130 No. 2, November 2020
    • November 1, 2020
    ...legislative from judicial lawmaking). (138.) Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.S. 97, 106 (1971). (139.) Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 248 (1969). (140.) Masur & Mortara, supra note 22, at 1010. For a discussion of reliance interests and social costs, see id. at 1002-03. (141.) S......
  • Paying for Gideon
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 99-5, July 2014
    • July 1, 2014
    ...U.S. 335, 340 (1963) (citing Johnson , 304 U.S. 458). 70. Id. at 342–43 (internal quotation marks omitted). 71. Desist v. United States, 394 U.S. 244, 268 (1969) (Harlan, J., dissenting) (emphasis added) (regarding the retroactivity of a decision related to unconstitutional search and seizu......