DESOTO GATHERING COMPANY, LLC V. HILL
| Docket Number | No. CV-16-990 |
| Decision Date | 30 November 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
Brown v. Towell
...by law. In sum, these statutes prescribe the administrative grievance process for a taxpayer. In DeSoto Gathering Co. LLC v. Hill , 2017 Ark. 326, at 3–4, 531 S.W.3d 396, 399, we addressed the statutes at issue, Ark. Code Ann. §§ 26-27-317 to -318, and explained the process for an aggrieved......
-
Miss. Cnty. v. City of Blytheville, CV–17–472
...We review issues of statutory interpretation de novo, as it is for this court to determine what a statute means. DeSoto Gathering Co. LLC v. Hill , 2017 Ark. 326, 531 S.W.3d 396. The primary rule of statutory interpretation is to give effect to the intent of the legislature. Keep Our Dollar......
-
3 Rivers Logistics, Inc. v. Brown-Wright Post No. 158 of the Am. Legion
...of any local noise ordinances. Because this is an issue of statutory interpretation, our review is de novo. DeSoto Gathering Co., LLC v. Hill , 2017 Ark. 326, 531 S.W.3d 396. However, this court will accept a circuit court's interpretation of the law unless it is shown that the court's inte......
-
Henson v. Cradduck
...practice of law. We employ a de novo standard of review for issues addressing the unauthorized practice of law. DeSoto Gathering Co. LLC v. Hill , 2017 Ark. 326, 531 S.W.3d 396. A party’s failure to timely object to the unauthorized practice of law does not prevent our review. Id. Although ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Chapter 3 Preserving Error
...can be raised for the first time on appeal, even sua sponte by the appellate court. DeSoto Gathering Co. v. Hill, 2017 Ark. 326, at 9, 531 S.W.3d 396, 402 (2017). • Procedural defects in the appeal, including defects that occurred in the circuit court, can be raised for the first time on ap......