Detroit Driving Club v. Fitzgerald
Decision Date | 30 June 1896 |
Citation | 67 N.W. 899,109 Mich. 670 |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Parties | DETROIT DRIVING CLUB v. FITZGERALD. |
Error to circuit court, Wayne county; William L. Carpenter, Judge.
Action by the Detroit Driving Club against William H. Fitzgerald to recover a sum alleged to be due plaintiff on a subscription by defendant to its capital stock. There was a judgment entered on a verdict directed by the court in favor of plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.
E. T. Wood, for appellant.
Moore & Moore (Otto Kirchner, of counsel), for appellee.
The plaintiff was organized under Act No. 22, Sess. Laws, 1883 and sued defendant to recover an unpaid subscription of stock. By direction of the court, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error. In July 1893, D. J. Campau, after some talk with defendant, presented him with a paper reading as follows: "Whereas, it is proposed to organize a corporation for the purpose of promoting good fellowship among its members, by providing a clubhouse and pleasure grounds for their entertainment, where at all times they may meet for social intercourse, and further to encourage, by providing their proper facilities raising, improving, breeding, training horses, at meetings to be held at stated times in each year: Now, therefore, we, the undersigned, for the purpose of such organization, do hereby severally subscribe the sum set opposite our respective names, to its capital stock, and agree to pay the same to said corporation, in installments, as called for from time to time by the board of directors." The paper bore the signature of 20 persons at $1,000 each, and one at $2,500. Mr. Fitzgerald signed for $2,500. Mr. Campau claims that at this time he informed Mr. Fitzgerald they had organized the Detroit Driving Club; that the corporation expected to have a capital stock of $150,000; that $68,000 was then subscribed and that they were going ahead to acquire the grounds and buildings, and would not wait for the full subscription. Mr. Fitzgerald denied that he was told by Mr. Campau they were going ahead before the capital stock was all subscribed. The club afterwards bought grounds, put up buildings, and spent a large sum of money. August 9, 1893, an assessment of 20 per cent. was made on all subscriptions to the capital stock. December 5, 1893, a further assessment of 80 per cent. was made; and the president was directed to let contracts for buildings, and to proceed with the work necessary to hold a race meeting,-the cost not to exceed $100,000. After the 20 per cent. assessment was made, Mr. Fitzgerald did not pay it on his subscription, and, in a conversation with Mr. Campau, said his money was tied up, and had some talk with him to the effect that he had subscribed for more stock than he could take care of, and a little later wrote a letter reading as follows: Mr. Campau replied as follows: Mr. Fitzgerald sent his check for $300, and a certificate was issued certifying that he had -and indorsed with the $300 payment. Article 3 of the plaintiff's articles of association reads as follows: Among the by-laws adopted by the association were the following: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial