Detroit Young Men's Society v. Mayor, of Detroit
| Decision Date | 01 January 1854 |
| Citation | 3 Mich. 172 |
| Parties | Detroit Young Men's Society v. Mayor, etc., of Detroit |
| Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
[Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material] [Syllabus Material]
Case reversed from Wayne Circuit.
The plaintiffs were incorporated by an act of the legislature of Michigan, approved March 26, 1836, which act is referred to and made a part of this case, to show, among other things, the purpose of the incorporation. The said society was organized under said act, and its by-laws and standing rules were referred to and made a part of the case. They have been for many years possessed of a library, which now amounts to nearly three thousand volumes, and have regularly, every year, from the time of its organization to the present time, had delivered before the society a course of lectures upon scientific, literary and general subjects, and have for the same time, and with the same regularity, sustained a course of debates upon the same subjects, which debates have been conducted by members of the society.
The society were, on the first day of April, 1853, the owners of a building situate in the city of Detroit, known as "The Young Men's Hall," together with the land on which it is erected. The building was erected for the use of the society in carrying out the purposes of its incorporation and organization. The lower or first story, not being required for the uses of the society, was finished into two stores, which, with the cellars below them, were leased by the society for business purposes, for a given rent, as are also two small officers in the second story. The remainder of the building, being four stories in front, was used entirely for the purposes of the society, for library rooms and for the meetings of the society and its officers, for the purposes of business, attending lectures, debates, etc.
The assessors of the city of Detroit, for the year A. D. 1853, assessed said lot and building belonging to said society, by the following description, viz.:
"Young Men's Society -- Gov. & J. P.
Jeff. Av. N. 45 feet--W. pt lot 11 sec 1. & E. pt lot 10 sec 1.
B. 2. $ 13,000.
On such assessment so made, the defendants, the mayor, recorder, aldermen and freemen of the city of Detroit, levied and charged a tax for city, school and sewer purposes for said year A. D. 1853, to the amount of one hundred and twenty-four 79-100 dollars; and said tax not being paid on the day of October, 1853, the collector of the 2d ward of said city, where said lot and building are situated, by a warrant issued under the authority of the defendants, and by their direction, levied and seized upon the library of said society, for the purpose of selling the same to pay said tax so assessed as aforesaid, and which was the wrong complained of by the plaintiffs. And upon these facts it was submitted whether: 1. The real estate of said society before described, or any portion of it, is subject to taxation by law, and if so, what portion. 2. Whether the assessment upon said property, as above, was legal; and, 3. Whether the tax levied thereon was valid, so that the property of the society taken for its payment was rightfully taken therefor.
C. I. & E. C. Walker, for plaintiffs:
The real estate described in the case submitted is exempt from taxation, and therefore, the assessment and levy were both invalid.
It is admitted that all property is subject to taxation, unless expressly exempt by law. Sess. Laws 1853, No. 86, § 1 p. 128.
Among the property expressly exempt, is the following: "The personal property of all library, benevolent, charitable and scientific institutions incorporated within the state, and such real estate belonging to such institution as shall actually be occupied by them for the purposes for which they were incorporated." Id. § 5, p. 129.
In seeking for a proper construction to be given to this and similar exemptions in our statutes, we must, of course, have reference to the well settled rules of construction.
One cardinal rule is, that courts must consider the policy of the statute, the object in view, the remedy intended, and give it such an interpretation as is best calculated to advance its object, and effect the design of the legislature.
Such an interpretation is never to be adopted as will defeat its own purpose, if it will admit of any other reasonable construction.
In considering a statute which has for its end the promotion of important and beneficial public objects, a large construction is to be given when it can be done without doing actual violence to its terms. Wollcott v. Pond, 19 Conn. 597.
Now, the obvious intention of the legislature, by the liberal provisions of the statute was, to exempt from taxation property devoted to intellectual, moral, and religious improvement, and to that extent to encourage and protect these highest interests of society, and to throw the burdens of taxation on property held for purposes of pleasure or self-interest.
To effectuate this intent, a large and liberal construction should be given to the terms used by the legislature.
But no such large or liberal construction is required, to exempt from taxation the property in question.
It was organized "for purposes of moral and intellectual improvement." See act of incorporation.
It was incorporated for the purposes of moral and intellectual improvement, and is expressly authorized "to establish and superintend a library."
The standing by-laws, made long before they had any real estate provide for a standing committee on library. (Art. 6, by-laws.)
The duties and responsibilities of a librarian are pointed out, the government of the library provided for. (Art. 9 and 10, by-laws.)
In 1849, the legislature authorized the society to loan on bond a sum not exceeding ten thousand dollars, to be appropriated to the purpose of erecting a building for the use of the society, or of adding to its library, and to no other purpose whatsoever." (Sess. Laws 1849, act No. 97, p. 98.)
The case shows that they have had a library for many years, and that it now amounts to nearly three thousand volumes.
We think that these references to the act of incorporation, showing the original purpose of the society; to the by-laws of the society, and the actual establishment of a library, showing that the original purpose has been carried out; the recognition of its being a library institution by the legislature in the act of 1849, fully establish the position that within the letter, as well as the spirit of the statute, this society is a "library institution."
If we have succeeded in establishing either of these propositions, then the real estate of the society is exempt from taxation, if used for the purposes for which it is incorporated.
The property in question is the Young Men's Hall, and the land on which it stands. The case finds that the building was erected for the use of the society, in carrying out the purposes of its organization. The lower story not being at present required for the uses of the society, is rented, as also are two small offices in the second story. The remainder of the building is used entirely for the purposes of the society.
It is very clear, therefore, that the real estate assessed, is real estate belonging to the society, and actually occupied by them for the purposes for which they were incorporated, and as such, exempt from taxation. If so, the assessment is wholly invalid, and also the tax levied upon it. McQuilkin v. Doe, 8 Blackf. 581; U. S. Dig. 1849, 411; Lackey v. Mercer County, 9 Barr 318.
If it be said that the whole of the property is not actually occupied by the society, and is not therefore exempt from taxation; for the purposes of this suit it is sufficient to say, that a portion of it, at least, is exempt, while the whole is taxed; and where a portion of an assessment is invalid, the whole is invalid. 2 Sup. Dig. 832, § 235; Jones v. Gibson, 2 Tayl. 41; Libby v. Burnham, 15 Mass. 147.
The building was erected for the society's use, and most of it is occupied by them. For the time being, some of the rooms are rented. This is an incidental matter, and should not affect the exemption of the whole property.
Nor does our statute contemplate that rooms in a building shall be separately assessed. It provides for the manner of describing real estate in the assessment, and this provision must be strictly complied with, or the assessment is invalid. That provision in relation to city property is as follows:
"In case of lands surveyed or laid out as a town or village, and a plat thereof recorded in the register's office of the county, if the tract to be assessed be a whole lot or block, it shall be described by a designation of the numbers thereof; if it be a part of a lot or block, it shall be described by its boundaries, or in some other way by which it may be known, and it shall not be necessary to insert the quantity of such lands on the assessment roll." Sess. Laws 1753, No. 86, p. 135, § 53. See Dike v. Lewis, 2 Barb. (S. C.) 345.
The portion of the property of the society which is rented, could not be described under this provision, without describing property which is exempt, and the legislature have never contemplated or provided for assessing property in the manner required to assess the rented property of the society, leaving that used by the society unassessed.
As a necessary result, therefore, none of the property of the society is liable to taxation.
Another objection to the present assessment is its...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Liberty Hill Housing v. City of Livonia
...case addressing the occupation requirement of Michigan's statutory tax exemption for nonprofit institutions was Detroit Young Men's Society v. Detroit, 3 Mich. 172 (1854).4 In that case, the plaintiff was incorporated "for the purpose of moral and intellectual improvement" and owned a build......
-
Tomra of N. Am., Inc. v. Dep't of Treasury
...whether the legislature should be forced by some version of strict construction to legislate less ....").12 Detroit Young Men's Society v. Detroit , 3 Mich. 172, 179 (1854). Earlier cases touched on the issue but did not make such a clear interpretive pronouncement. See Lefevre v. Detroit ,......
-
State ex rel. Y.M.C.A. v. Gehner
...of the use of the basement rooms, the same being commercial, the building was subject to taxation. [Detroit Young Men's Society v. Mayor, 3 Mich. 172.] 11 S.W.2d 37 Following the Missouri case of Fitterer v. Crawford, the Supreme Court of Illinois decided that while a school was an educatio......
-
State ex rel. St. Louis Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Gehner
... ... Carr, 322 Ill. 562; Congregational Society v. Board ... of Review, 290 Ill. 108; Sisters of Third ... purposes exempted by statute. [ Y. M. C. A. v. Mayor of N ... Y., 113 N.Y. 187.] ... And ... taxation. [ Detroit Young Men's Society v. Mayor, ... 3 Mich. 172.] ... [11 ... ...