DeVargas v. State ex rel. New Mexico Dept. of Corrections

Decision Date22 February 1982
Docket NumberNo. 13965,13965
Citation97 N.M. 563,642 P.2d 166,1982 NMSC 25
PartiesAntonio "Ike" DeVARGAS, Petitioner, v. STATE of New Mexico, ex rel. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Clyde O. Malley, Edwin T. Mahr, Michael Hanrahan, John Does 1 through 10, Respondents.
CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court
Singleton & Roberts-Hohl, Sarah Michael Singleton, Santa Fe, Richard Rosenstock, Chama, Sena & Herrera, Robert Sena, Santa Fe, for petitioner

FEDERICI, Justice.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals was filed on October 1, 1981. 640 P.2d 1327. A petition for writ of certiorari was filed in this Court on November 9, 1981. Thereafter, the petition for writ of certiorari was granted on November 20, 1981.

After an exhaustive review of the transcripts, briefs and authorities, it is the decision of this Court that the petition for writ of certiorari heretofore granted be quashed as improvidently issued.

Under Section 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the statute of limitations applicable is that which applies to the most closely analogous cause of action under state law.

In Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 100 S.Ct. 1790, 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980), the Supreme Court of the United States clearly stated that lower federal courts must look to and apply the state statute of limitations governing the state cause of action provided by state law which is most closely analogous to Section 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and which is not inconsistent with the Constitution and Laws of the United States.

Under New Mexico law, the most closely analogous state cause of action is provided for by the New Mexico Tort Claims Act under Section 41-4-12, N.M.S.A. 1978. The statute of limitations applicable to a cause of action under Section 41-4-12 is set forth in Section 41-4-15, N.M.S.A. 1978. Under Section 41-4-15, the action must be commenced within two years after the occurrence which results in the injury.

The original complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. McClelland v. Facteau, 610 F.2d 693 (10th Cir. 1979). The amendment to the complaint which was filed after the two-year statute of limitations had run did not relate back to the original filing since the original complaint did not state a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Garcia v. Wilson, s. 83-1017
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 30 Marzo 1984
    ... ... Atty. Gen., Asst. Legal Advisor, New Mexico State Police, Santa Fe, N.M., filed a brief on ... New Mexico Supreme Court's holding in DeVargas v. New Mexico, 97 N.M. 563, 642 P.2d 166 (1982), ... ...
  • Fuchilla v. Layman
    • United States
    • New Jersey Supreme Court
    • 8 Febrero 1988
    ...N.W.2d 920 (1985); DeVargas v. State ex rel. N.M. Dep't of Corrections, 97 N.M. 447, 640 P.2d 1327 (Ct.App.1981), cert. quashed, 97 N.M. 563, 642 P.2d 166 (1982); Edgar v. State, 92 Wash.2d 217, 595 P.2d 534 (1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1077, 100 S.Ct. 1026, 62 L.Ed.2d 760 (1980); Boldt v......
  • Wilson v. Garcia
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • 17 Abril 1985
    ... ... § 1983 against petitioners, a New Mexico State Police officer and the Chief of the State ... DeVargas v. New Mexico, 97 N.M. 563, 642 P.2d 166 (1982) ... ...
  • DeVargas v. Montoya
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • 8 Julio 1986
    ... ... state courts of New Mexico generally alleging a violation of his ... DeVargas v. State ex rel. New Mexico Department of Corrections, 97 N.M. 563, 642 ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT