Devine v. Cote, 5797
Decision Date | 26 November 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 5797,5797 |
Citation | 109 N.H. 235,248 A.2d 77 |
Parties | Maurice F. DEVINE, Tr. v. Alpheage A. COTE et al. |
Court | New Hampshire Supreme Court |
Devine, Millimet, McDonough, Stahl & Branch and John S. Holland, Manchester, for plaintiff filed no brief.
Stein, Cleaveland & Rudman, Nashua, for Cote.
Danais & Danais and Thomas B. Wingate, Manchester, for defendant Conrad Danais, guardian of Leo Bouchard.
Leonard, Leonard & Prolman and Gerald R. Prunier, Nashua, for defendant Wesley Greeley.
Petition for instructions by the plaintiff who is the successor trustee under the will of Mary Bouchard whose will dated January 18, 1935 was duly allowed. The parties submitted an agreed statement of facts. The Court (Leahy, C.J.) reserved and transferred without ruling the questions of law relating to the trustee's duties as to the disposition of the trust fund under the will for the benefit of testatrix's son, Leo E. Bouchard, who is and has been since World War I a mentally incompetent veteran.
The testatrix bequeathed the residue of her estate in trust for her son '* * * for his support, maintenance and education while the said Leo E. Bouchard is unable to manage his affairs, and when he is able to take care of his affairs then this bequest is to vest in him absolutely and in fee simple to him and his heirs forever; provided nevertheless that if the said Leo E. Bouchard should die before the termination of this trust, without leaving issue surviving him, then this bequest should go to my said sister, Julie Anna Cote nee Tremblay, to her and her heirs forever.'
The amount of the trust fund at the time the successor trustee was appointed in 1951 was approximately $7,700 and is now $20,000. During this period no payments have been made to the beneficiary, Leo, or his guardian. The amount of the guardian's fund is $60,000 and the guardian continues to receive monthly veteran's benefits. According to the agreed statement of facts this monthly payment ios $350 but this facts this monthly payment is $350 but this legislation. Prior to 1966 the beneficiary, Leo, was confined to a veterans hospital and the expenses of the guardian have been minimal but now Leo has been placed in a private nursing home at an average monthly expense of $700.
The agreed statement of facts contains the following statement:
While it is certain that Leo has and will continue to receive such support and maintenance as he needs, his probable heirs at law on the one hand and the remaindermen under the trust on the other hand each claim that the other fund should bear the burden of paying for it. If there is any decision squarely in point it has eluded counsel and the court. We start with 2 Scott, Trusts (3d ed. 1967). s. 128.4, p. 1020: (emphasis supplied). While the will is silent on this question, in 'all of these cases, if the intention of the settlor is not clearly expressed, resort may be had to all the circumstances in order to determine his intention.' Scott, supra, p. 1024. The size of the trust estate, the nature and extent of the other resources, the condition in life of the beneficiary, and the purpose of the trust are some of the circumstances that are important in reaching a decision. Rogers v. Munsey, 103 N.H. 37, 41, 164 A.2d 554; Munsey v. Laconia Home, 103 N.H. 42, 46, 164 A.2d 557; Amoskeag Trust Co. v. Wentworth, 99 N.H. 346, 111 A.2d 198; Indian Head Nat'l Bank v. Theriault,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Austin v. U.S. Bank of Washington
...8 Ariz.App. 591, 448 P.2d 435 (1968); In re Trust of True, 158 So.2d 571 (Fla.App.1964), cert. denied, 165 So.2d 463; Devine v. Cote, 109 N.H. 235, 248 A.2d 77 (1968). Other courts have found no such duty. In re Coats Trust, 581 S.W.2d 392 (Mo.App.1979); Estate of Stillman, 107 Misc.2d 102,......
-
Wszolek's Estate, In re
...of her ward, Jennie, as guardian, had a secondary duty to consider the interest of Doris in the joint account. See Devine v. Cote, 109 N.H. 235, 238, 248 A.2d 77, 80 (1968); Morse v. Trentini, The agreed facts show that during the approximately five weeks of her guardianship, Jennie spent $......
-
Hodges v. Johnson
...to the beneficiaries as "reasonable and appropriate" for the beneficiaries' "welfare, enjoyment, and education." See Devine v. Cote, 109 N.H. 235, 237, 248 A.2d 77 (1968) (describing trust as "a trust for support"); see also RSA 564–B:4–404 (2007) (amended 2011) (providing that "[a] trust a......
-
Griffin's Estate, In re, No. 6063
...of the testatrix as expressed in her will is to be carried out to the fullest extent feasible under the circumstances. Devine v. Cote, 109 N.H. 235, 238, 248 A.2d 77, 80. It is a fundamental rule of construction that when a phrase used in a will is neither as clear or precise as it could be......