DeVore v. Lederman

Decision Date31 January 2005
Docket Number2004-02127.
Citation2005 NY Slip Op 00523,14 A.D.3d 648,789 N.Y.S.2d 507
PartiesMELVYN DEVORE, Appellant, v. GILBERT S. LEDERMAN et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the 90-day notice dated November 19, 2001, served by the defendants on the plaintiff properly conformed to the provisions of CPLR 3216(cf.Airmont Homes v Town of Ramapo,69 NY2d 901, 902[1987];Schuering v Stella,243 AD2d 623, 624[1997]).Furthermore, the additional language contained in the notice demanding that the plaintiff comply with all previous discovery demands did not render the 90-day notice null and void nor did it exceed the scope of the statute since both parties had the right to conduct further discovery even after the 90-day notice was served (seeAllone v University Hosp. of N.Y. Univ. Med. Ctr.,249 AD2d 430, 432[1998];Baxt v Cohen,96 AD2d 661[1983];Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons Laws of NY, Book7B, CPLR C3216:22).

Having been served with a 90-day notice pursuant to CPLR 3216 and having failed to comply with the notice by filing a note of issue or by moving, before the default date, either to vacate the notice or extend the 90-day period, the plaintiff was required to demonstrate both a justifiable excuse for the delay in properly responding to the 90-day notice and the existence of a meritorious cause of action (seeWalters v Hoboken Wood Flooring Corp.,6...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Byers v. Winthrop Univ. Hosp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 21, 2012
    ...v. County of Nassau, 80 A.D.3d at 555, 914 N.Y.S.2d 653;Sharpe v. Osorio, 21 A.D.3d 467, 468, 800 N.Y.S.2d 213;DeVore v. Lederman, 14 A.D.3d 648, 649, 789 N.Y.S.2d 507). In light of the plaintiff's failure to do either, the complaint was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3216 ( see Peters......
  • Fenner v. County of Nassau
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 11, 2011
    ...time within which to serve and file a note of issue ( see Sharpe v. Osorio, 21 A.D.3d 467, 468, 800 N.Y.S.2d 213; DeVore v. Lederman, 14 A.D.3d 648, 649, 789 N.Y.S.2d 507; Bokhari v. Home Depot U.S.A., 4 A.D.3d 381, 382, 771 N.Y.S.2d 395). In light of the plaintiff's failureto do either, th......
  • Bhatti v. Empire Realty Assocs., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 26, 2012
    ...A.D.3d 467, 468, 800 N.Y.S.2d 213;Giannoccoli v. One Cent. Park W. Assoc., 15 A.D.3d 348, 348–349, 790 N.Y.S.2d 159;DeVore v. Lederman, 14 A.D.3d 648, 649, 789 N.Y.S.2d 507). The plaintiffs did neither. Accordingly, the action was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3216 ( see Shcherbina v.......
  • Dahlin v. Paladino
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 31, 2005

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT