Diaz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
| Decision Date | 14 March 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-2144,89-2144 |
| Citation | 898 F.2d 774 |
| Parties | , Unempl.Ins.Rep. CCH 15311A Jose Archie DIAZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit |
Gary J. Martone, Albuquerque, N.M., for plaintiff-appellant.
William Lutz, U.S. Atty. and Ronald Ross, Asst. U.S. Atty., Albuquerque, N.M., Gayla Fuller, Chief Counsel, Region VI, Karen Sharp, Principal Regional Counsel, Social Security Disability Litigation Branch, and Joseph B. Liken, Supervisory Lead Atty., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Before SEYMOUR, TACHA, and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Jose Archie Diaz appeals from the order of the district court declining to reverse the decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services denying Diaz's request for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) benefits. Diaz contends on appeal (1) that the Secretary's decision is not supported by substantial evidence, (2) that the Secretary failed to meet his burden of proof in showing that Diaz had residual functional capacity and was capable of holding a sedentary job, and (3) that the Secretary erred in refusing to order a psychological examination. We affirm.
Diaz is an epileptic who suffers from petit mal seizures which occur, according to his testimony, approximately four to five times a month. In June 1985, Diaz suffered several seizures in one day, probably as a result of an inappropriate change in his medication. The seizures caused a minimal compression fracture of two or three thoracic vertebrae. Diaz also claims to suffer from pain, depression, and limited functional capacity.
Diaz requested SSI benefits on July 15, 1985. The request was denied on August 20, 1985. Diaz filed for reconsideration, which was also denied. Ultimately, a hearing before an ALJ was scheduled on May 5, 1986.
At the hearing the ALJ heard Diaz testify that he suffers from depression, is physically capable of sitting for only one-half hour, walking one-half mile, and lifting ten pounds. Diaz also testified that he has stomach problems due to tension and side effects from his seizure medications. The ALJ also heard from Diaz' sister, who testified as to Diaz' seizures and that he frequently appeared to be in pain and nervous. She also corroborated Diaz' testimony that occasionally he needed assistance getting in and out of bed and putting on shoes. Finally, the ALJ heard from a vocational expert, who evaluated Diaz' condition. The vocational expert testified that she believed that Diaz would be capable of holding a sedentary job based on his past job experience, current exertional and non-exertional impairments, and other testimony presented at the hearing and in the record.
The ALJ denied Diaz' request for SSI benefits, finding that Diaz was no longer able to perform his earlier job, but that his complaints about functional limitations were not supported by the record. In reaching this conclusion, the ALJ rejected the opinion of Diaz' treating physician, Dr. Novosad, and placed primary reliance on the opinions of consulting physicians, who had provided more detailed diagnoses, and on his observation that Diaz' testimony was less then credible. The ALJ also relied on the opinion of the vocational expert that Diaz retained residual functional capacity capable of undertaking sedentary work.
The Appeals Council declined to review the ALJ's decision. The ALJ's opinion thus became the final decision of the Secretary. Diaz filed for review of the Secretary's decision in district court, which denied his request. This appeal followed.
We will uphold decisions of the Secretary denying SSI benefits if that decision has substantial support in the record. See Knipe v. Heckler, 755 F.2d 141, 144-45 (10th Cir.1985). We agree with Diaz that where, as here, the Secretary determines that the applicant cannot return to his prior work activity, the Secretary bears the burden to prove that the applicant can find other employment in the economy. See Channel v. Heckler, 747 F.2d 577, 579 (10th Cir.1984).
In this case, the Secretary determined that Diaz could obtain sedentary employment, and thus denied Diaz's SSI application. Because of the nature of Diaz's impairments, the Secretary rested his decision on evidence presented by a vocational expert and several consulting physicians. Diaz challenges the testimony of the vocational expert, urging that the Secretary's reliance is misplaced because the ALJ failed to include Diaz's pain, headaches, blurred vision, poor control over epileptic seizures, and drug side effects in hypothethical questions. We disagree.
Initially, we note that the vocational expert revised her opinion of Diaz's functional capacity after listening to the hearing testimony, finding that Diaz was at most capable of sedentary, rather than medium or light work. This change in the vocational...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Beauclair v. Barnhart, Civil Action No. 05-3224-CM.
...585, 587 (10th Cir.1990). "Credibility determinations are peculiarly the province of the finder of fact." Diaz v. Sec'y of Health & Human Serv., 898 F.2d 774, 777 (10th Cir.1990). Therefore, in reviewing the ALJ's credibility determinations, the court will usually "defer to the ALJ as trier......
-
Scott v. Berryhill
...the province of the finder of fact." Cowan v. Astrue, 552 F.3d 1182, 1190 (10th Cir. 2008) (citing Diaz v. Secretary of Health & Human Svcs., 898 F.2d 774, 777 (10th Cir. 1990) ).Plaintiff does not address the totality of the evidence, for example: (1) records indicating that Plaintiff's cu......
-
Bush v. Apfel, 97-CV-538-EA.
...economy which the claimant—taking into account his age, education, work experience, and RFC—can perform. See Diaz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 898 F.2d 774 (10th Cir.1990). Disability benefits are denied if the Commissioner shows that the impairment which precluded the performance......
-
Stewart v. Astrue
...1276, 1278 (11th Cir.1999). "The Secretary has broad latitude in ordering a consultative examination." Diaz v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 898 F.2d 774, 778 (10th Cir.1990); Reed v. Massanari, 270 F.3d 838, 842 (9th Cir.2001) (citing Diaz). Thus, there is "no absolute duty under......
-
Administrative review issues
...Commissioner ‘has broad latitude in ordering a consultative examination.’” Id. at 842, quoting Diaz v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs. , 898 F.2d 774, 778 (10 th Cir. 1990). In Reed , the court found that for the ALJ to choose to proceed without ordering a consultative examination by a rhe......
-
Table of Cases
...2009), 3d-09 Diaz v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 499 F.3d 640, 648 (7th Cir. 2007), 7th-10 Diaz v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 898 F.2d 774, 778 (10th Cir. 1990), § 504.6 Diaz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs ., 791 F. Supp. 905, 912 (D.P.R. 1992), §§ 203.1, 203.16 Diaz v. Sh......
-
Table of cases
...2009), 3d-09 Diaz v. Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. , 499 F.3d 640, 648 (7th Cir. 2007), 7th-10 Diaz v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 898 F.2d 774, 778 (10th Cir. 1990), § 504.6 Diaz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs ., 791 F. Supp. 905, 912 (D.P.R. 1992), §§ 203.1, 203.16 Diaz v. Sh......
-
Standards of Review and Federal Court Remedies
...in the determination of the case,” Gay v. Sullivan , 986 F.2d 1336, 1341 n.3 (10th Cir. 1993); Diaz v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 898 F.2d 774, 777 (10th Cir. 1990), and that an “ALJ’s conduct, although improper, did not require reversal” because the procedural impropriety involved......