Dick v. Board of Education
| Decision Date | 14 March 1922 |
| Docket Number | No. 22369.,22369. |
| Citation | Dick v. Board of Education, 238 S.W. 1073 (Mo. 1922) |
| Parties | DICK v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF CITY OF ST. LOUIS. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court; Victor H. Falkenhainer, Judge.
Action by Harry Lee Dick, a minor, by his next friend, Harry L. Dick, against the Board of Education of the City of St. Louis. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Hudson & Hudson, of St. Louis, for appellant.
Robert Burkham, of St. Louis, for respondent.
This is a suit for personal injuries instituted January 9, 1919. The damage is laid in the petition at $35,000.
The petition states, in substance, that the plaintiff, on November 22, 1918, was a pupil in the Cote Brilliante public school of the city of St. Louis, and while in that capacity, he was rightfully upon the playground of the school premises, the defendant, by its servant and agent in charge of and operating a motortruck owned and operated by it in the performance of its corporate duties, carelessly and negligently ran said motortruck Over the plaintiff, inflicting upon him serious and permanent injuries. To this petition, to which no formal objection is made, the defendant interposed a general demurrer; so that the question is presented whether or not the defendant corporation is liable In damages for personal injuries inflicted by its servants and agents while engaged in the performance of duties devolved by law on such corporate bodies.
There can be no doubt that, when the state establishes and provides for the maintenance, operation, and management of public schools for the education of all children alike, at the expense of the public, it is acting in pursuance of a governmental policy founded solely in the public good. When these duties are, as in this case (section 11456, R. S. Mo. 1919), confided by law to a quasi corporation created for that purpose, such corporation is charged with the use of public...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
O'Dell v. School Dist. of Independence
...1050; Krueger v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis (Banc), 310 Mo. 239, 274 S.W. 811, 40 A.L.R. 1086; Dick v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, Mo.Sup., 238 S.W. 1073. Our holdings have been so uniform that nothing is to be gained by restating the reasons for and against the do......
-
Bang v. Independent School Dist. No. 27
...682; Herman v. Bd. of Education of Union School Dist., 234 N. Y. 196, 137 N. E. 24, 24 A. L. R. 1070; Dick v. Bd. of Education of St. Louis (Mo. Sup.) 238 S. W. 1073, 21 A. L. R. 1328; Gold v. City of Baltimore, 137 Md. 335, 112 A. 588, 14 A. L. R. 1392; Stovall v. Toppenish School Dist. No......
-
Pearson v. Kansas City
...v. St. Louis, 112 Mo. 138; Cunningham v. St. Louis, 96 Mo. 53; Kruger v. Board of Education, 310 Mo. 248, 274 S.W. 814; Dick v. Board of Education, 238 S.W. 1073; Cochran v. Wilson, 287 Mo. 210, 229 S.W. Zummo v. Kansas City, 285 Mo. 222, 225 S.W. 934; Healey v. Kansas City, 277 Mo. 619, 21......
-
Todd v. Curators of University of Missouri
...until it be changed by positive legislative enactment. [Cochran v. Wilson, 287 Mo. 210, l. c. 226, 227, 229 S.W. 1050; Dick v. Board of Education (Mo.), 238 S.W. 1073; Meadow Park Land Co. v. School District, 301 688, 257 S.W. 441, 31 A. L. R. 343; Nicholas v. Evangelical Deaconess Home, 28......