Dickerson v. Greene

Decision Date17 November 1892
Docket Number2,362.
Citation53 F. 247
PartiesDICKERSON v. GREENE et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Rhode Island

Cowen, Dickerson, Nicoll & Brown, for complainant.

David S. Baker, Jr., and William C. Baker, for respondents.

Statement by CARPENTER, District Judge:

This is a bill in equity to enjoin an alleged infringement of letters patent for an invention. The bill alleges that 'on the 30th day of October, 1888, letters patent of the United States numbered No. 391,875 * * * were issued, * * * as by a certified copy of said letters patent in court to be produced will more fully appear. ' The respondents demur because the complainant 'has nowhere set forth what the 'medical compound' is, the alleged sale of which by said respondents he claims to be an infringement.'

CARPENTER, District Judge.

The respondents, in support of their demurrer, argue that the bill should set out the nature of the patented invention, or at least should make the specification of the letters patent a part of the bill in express words. But it seems to be settled, at least in the practice of the federal courts, that profert of an instrument, such as this bill makes, is sufficient to make such instrument a part of the bill. Bogart v. Hinds, 25 F. 184; American Bell Tel. Co. v. Southern Tel. Co., 34 F. 803. This demurrer must therefore be overruled, and the respondents ordered to answer over.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT