Dickson v. Rucho, 14–839.
| Court | United States Supreme Court |
| Citation | 135 S.Ct. 1843 (Mem),191 L.Ed.2d 719 |
| Docket Number | No. 14–839.,14–839. |
| Parties | Margaret DICKSON, et al., petitioners, v. Robert RUCHO, et al. |
| Decision Date | 20 April 2015 |
135 S.Ct. 1843 (Mem)
191 L.Ed.2d 719
Margaret DICKSON, et al., petitioners,
v.
Robert RUCHO, et al.
No. 14–839.
Supreme Court of the United States
April 20, 2015.
Opinion
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama,575 U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1257, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2015).
To continue reading
Request your trial
10 cases
-
Cause v. Rucho, No. 1:16–CV–1026
...137 S.Ct. 2186, 198 L.Ed.2d 252 (2017) (mem.); Dickson v. Rucho , 367 N.C. 542, 766 S.E.2d 238 (N.C. 2014), vacated , ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1843, 191 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015) (mem.). However, on February 5, 2016, a three-judge panel presiding in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District ......
-
Dickson v. Rucho, No. 201PA12–3.
...Caucus v. Alabama, –––U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1257, 191 L.Ed.2d 314 (2015) (Alabama ). Dickson v. Rucho, ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1843, 191 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015) (mem.).In compliance with the Supreme Court's mandate, we have reconsidered this case in light of Alabama. Specifically, Alabama requir......
-
Common Cause v. Rucho, No. 1:16-CV-1026
...2186, 198 L.Ed.2d 252 (2017) (mem.); 318 F.Supp.3d 805 Dickson v. Rucho , 367 N.C. 542, 766 S.E.2d 238 (2014), vacated , ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1843, 191 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015) (mem.). However, on February 5, 2016, a three-judge panel presiding in the U.S. District Court for the Middle Distri......
-
Covington v. North Carolina, 1:15CV399
...See Harris, 159 F.Supp.3d 600 ; 270 F.Supp.3d 886 Dickson v. Rucho, 367 N.C. 542, 766 S.E.2d 238 (2014), vacated, ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1843, 191 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015) (mem.). A separate panel of this Court concluded that the two majority-minority districts included in the state's congressi......
Request a trial to view additional results