Dickson v. Rucho

Decision Date20 April 2015
Docket NumberNo. 14–839.,14–839.
Citation135 S.Ct. 1843 (Mem),191 L.Ed.2d 719
PartiesMargaret DICKSON, et al., petitioners, v. Robert RUCHO, et al.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Opinion

On petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Judgment vacated, and case remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama,575 U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1257, ––– L.Ed.2d –––– (2015).

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Covington v. North Carolina
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • January 21, 2018
    ... ... See N.C. Const. art. II, 3, 5. As the appointed chairs of the redistricting committees in their respective chambers, Senator Robert Rucho and Representative David Lewis (collectively, the "Chairs"), both Republicans, led efforts to draw and enact legislative districting maps for use in ... See 283 F.Supp.3d 416 Dickson v. Rucho , 367 N.C. 542, 766 S.E.2d 238 (2014), vacated , U.S. , 135 S.Ct. 1843, 191 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015) (mem.). A divided Supreme Court of North ... ...
  • Covington v. North Carolina
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • September 19, 2017
    ... ... See N.C. Const. art. II, 3, 5. As the appointed chairs of the redistricting committees in their respective chambers, Senator Robert Rucho and Representative David Lewis together led efforts to craft and approve legislative districting maps for use in both state and federal elections in ... See Harris , 159 F.Supp.3d 600 ; 270 F.Supp.3d 886 Dickson v. Rucho , 367 N.C. 542, 766 S.E.2d 238 (2014), vacated , U.S. , 135 S.Ct. 1843, 191 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015) (mem.). A separate panel of this Court ... ...
  • Dickson v. Rucho
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 18, 2015
  • Cause v. Rucho
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of North Carolina
    • January 9, 2018
    ... ... Harris , 159 F.Supp.3d at 60910. The North Carolina Supreme Court twice 279 F.Supp.3d 601 ruled that the 2011 Plan did not violate the state or federal constitution. Dickson v. Rucho , 368 N.C. 481, 781 S.E.2d 404, 41011 (N.C. 2015), vacated , U.S. , 137 S.Ct. 2186, 198 L.Ed.2d 252 (2017) (mem.); Dickson v. Rucho , 367 N.C. 542, 766 S.E.2d 238 (N.C. 2014), vacated , U.S. , 135 S.Ct. 1843, 191 L.Ed.2d 719 (2015) (mem.). However, on February 5, 2016, a ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT