Diggs v. State, 75--149

Decision Date30 June 1976
Docket NumberNo. 75--149,75--149
Citation334 So.2d 333
PartiesDavid Lee DIGGS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and Steven H. Denman, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Richard G. Pippinger, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Diggs was tried in the circuit court on an information charging him with unlawfully departing the scene of an accident involving a personal injury. 1 At trial the state recognized that the statute number set forth in the information, to wit, § 316.061, was incorrect and moved to amend the statute number to § 316.027, which motion was granted by the court. The state failed to amend the body of the information to include the word 'willfully' so as to make the offense a felony under § 316.027(2). 2

The jury returned a guilty verdict and the court, assuming that Diggs had been convicted of a felony under § 316.027(2), sentenced him to six months to five years. Subsequently Diggs filed a motion to vacate and after a hearing the court vacated the original sentence and re-sentenced Diggs to one year in the county jail.

A person not charged with willfully failing to stop under these circumstances can only be convicted of a misdemeanor. State ex rel. Miller v. Patterson, Fla.App.2nd, 1973, 284 So.2d 9.

Accordingly, the judgment and sentence on the felony charge are vacated and the cause is remanded with instructions to enter a judgment of conviction on the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Stanfill v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • 3 d4 Abril d4 1980
    ...remanded to the trial court to enter a judgment of conviction of a misdemeanor and to impose sentence accordingly. See Diggs v. State, 334 So.2d 333 (Fla.2d DCA 1976). It is so ENGLAND, C. J. and ADKINS and McDONALD, JJ., concur. OVERTON, J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opi......
  • Stanfill v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 23 d5 Junho d5 1978
    ...State ex rel. Miller v. Patterson, 284 So.2d 9 (Fla.App. 2 1973); State ex rel. Seal v. Shepard, 299 So.2d 644 (Fla.App. 1 1974); Diggs v. State, 334 So.2d 333 (Fla.App. 2 1976); Holmes v. State, 342 So.2d 134 (Fla.App. 1 1977) and other relevant statutes and rules which will be hereinafter......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT