Dikeman's Estate, In re, 39667
Decision Date | 11 June 1955 |
Docket Number | No. 39667,39667 |
Citation | 284 P.2d 622,178 Kan. 188 |
Parties | In the Matter of the ESTATE of Randal DIKEMAN, Deceased. Eisie MARDIS, Appellant, v. Wanda Lorraine KONOLD and Shirley Ann Lawton, Executrices of the Estate of Randal Dikeman, Deceased, Appellees. |
Court | Kansas Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
1. The guest statute of this state, G.S.1949, 8-122b, provides that no person who is transported by the owner or operator of a motor vehicle, as his guest, without payment for such transportation, shall have a cause of action for damages against such owner or operator for injury, death or damage, unless such injury, death or damage shall have resulted from the gross and wanton negligence of the operator of such motor vehicle.
2. Rules governing the construction of petitions before and after attacks by motions to make more definite and certain stated, discussed and applied.
3. The petition in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained while riding in an automobile alleges in substance that during the month of April, 1953, Randal Dikeman, the plaintiff, and other persons therein named were members of the Order of the Eastern Star, a fraternal organization; that as members of such organization they had been chosen as delegates and representatives of their local Chapter to attend the Grand Chapter meeting of such Order at Topeka; that in contemplation of the trip plaintiff and Randal Dikeman orally agreed she would pay him a reasonable sum for transporting her to Topeka and return to Pratt, Kansas; that pursuant to such arrangement Dikeman transported plaintiff, along with others, to Topeka, the purpose of the trip being to attend the Grand Chapter meeting of the Order to be held in that city; that there Dikeman, plaintiff, and others accompanying on the trip discussed what each would pay him for their transportation from Pratt to Topeka and return and decided the amount thereof should be reasonable and finally fixed upon completion of the return trip; that thereafter all parties left Topeka in Dikeman's automobile for the return to Pratt but such trip was not completed due to the fact the auomobile in which all parties were riding was involved in an accident with a Missouri Pacific freight train at a railroad crossing at Turon, resulting in the death of Dikeman and his wife and serious injuries to the plaintiff. Following Bedenbender v. Walls, 177 Kan. 531, 280 P.2d 630, it is held that under the facts above stated and others alleged in the petition, (1) plaintiff was a guest in the Dikeman automobile at the time of the accident; (2) the guest statute, G.S.1949, 8-122b, has application; and (3) the trial court did not err in sustaining a demurrer to the petition, which states a cause of action for ordinary negligence only.
Payne H. Ratner, Wichita, and Louise Mattox, Payne H. Ratner, Jr., Russell Cranmer, Dale B. Stinson, Jr., Carroll F. Pope, Keith Eales, Cliff W. Ratner, and William L. Fry, Wichita, and Max C. Bucklin, Pratt, on the brief, for appellant.
Eldon L. Meigs, Pratt, and Paul R. Wunsch, Kingman, and Richard Barrett and George Barrett, Pratt, and Charles H. Stewart, Kingman, on the brief, for appellees.
This action originated with the filing of a petition, in the nature of a claim, in the probate court to recover damages from the estate of a decedent for personal injuries sustained by the claimant while riding as a passenger in the decedent's automobile. Pursuant to a request included in that pleading the cause, as authorized by statute, G.S.1949, 59-2402, was transferred to the district court where all subsequent proceedings were had.
The petition contains two causes of action. The first seeks to recover damages for plaintiff's own personal injuries and the second, based on the allegations of the first, is for the benefit of her husband, as the statute permits, G.S.1949, 23-205, for loss sustained by reason of her inability to perform services in the household and in the discharge of her domestic duties as the result of the involved accident. The first cause of action fully discloses the facts, as well as the theory, on which plaintiff bases her right of recovery and portions thereof, particularly all allegations throwing light on whether the guest statute, G.S.1949, 8-122b, has application, should be quoted at length.
Limited as above indicated and omitting formal averments, allegations of no consequence to the appellate issue including those of the second cause of action, assertions as to the nature and extent of injuries sustained, and the prayer, the petition reads:
'I.
'II.
'III.
'IV.
'The Grand Chapter of the Order of the Eastern Star for the State of Kansas authorized the payment of petitioner's transportation costs to and from the April, 1953, Grand Chapter meetings at Topeka, Kansas, and the deceased, Randal Dikeman, agreed to accept payment for the transportation of this petitioner.
'V.
'That on said trip to the April, 1953, Grand Chapter meeting Randal Dikeman, Deceased, Mrs. Randal Dikeman, Deceased, and this petitioner were accompanied by Mrs. Lanice Hoffman and Mrs. Ernest Munch.
'VI.
'Petitioner, Randal Dikeman, Deceased, and Mrs. Randal Dikeman, Deceased, did attend said April, 1953, Grand Chapter meeting of the Order of the Eastern Star at Topeka, Kansas, and did represent the interests of said Sarah E. Stewart Chapter 150, of the Order of the Eastern Star, at the business sessions thereof.
'VII.
'VIII.
The defendants, who are...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Lloyd v. Runge
...124 P.2d 461; In re Estate of Wright, 170 Kan. 600, 228 P.2d 911; Bedenbender v. Walls, 177 Kan. 531, 280 P.2d 630; In re Estate of Dikeman, 178 Kan. 188, 284 P.2d 622. And added, that since oral arguments, supplemental briefs have been submitted by the parties wherein appellant relies on K......
-
Rupe v. Smith
...or why the fatal accident occurred, it is held, distinguishing Bedenbender v. Walls, 177 Kan. 531, 280 P.2d 630; and In re Estate of Dikeman, 178 Kan. 188, 284 P.2d 622, that under the facts as alleged in the petition, (1) the decedent is a 'paying guest' for such transportation in the auto......
-
Henry v. Bauder
...statute even if no actual payment in money is made to the driver. (Ehrsam v. Borgen, 185 Kan. 776, 347 P.2d 260.) In In re Estate of Dikeman, 178 Kan. 188, 284 P.2d 622, the driver and his passenger were delegates to attend the national meeting of a fraternal organization. The passenger ora......
-
Schmid v. Eslick
...Ins. Co., supra); delegates of a fraternal organization traveling together to a state convention and sharing expenses (In re Estate of Dikeman, 178 Kan. 188, 284 P.2d 622); and, a farmer riding to town at the invitation of his neighbor to sell the farmer's produce (Kessler v. Davis, supra),......