DIMAS-MARTINEZ V. STATE

Docket NumberNo. CR 11-5
Decision Date08 December 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
31 cases
  • Lard v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 13 février 2014
    ...discretion of the circuit court, and this court will not reverse absent a showing of manifest abuse of discretion. Dimas–Martinez v. State, 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238. Likewise, the balancing mandated by Rule 403 is also a matter left to a circuit court's sound discretion, and an appella......
  • People v. Of
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 1 juin 2020
    ...people share and discuss what is happening at a particular moment in time through the use of ‘tweets.’ " Dimas-Martinez v. State , 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238, 243 n.3 (2011).3 A tweet is a message posted to Twitter that might contain text or other media. A tweet appears on the sender's p......
  • State v. Webster, 13–1095.
    • United States
    • Iowa Supreme Court
    • 19 juin 2015
    ...penalty case, a juror tweeted10 throughout the trial and continued to do so even after being told to stop. Dimas–Martinez v. State, 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238, 247–48 (2011). In another case, a tweeting juror rambled about trial proceedings. United States v. Fumo, 639 F.Supp.2d 544, 555 ......
  • Turner v. State
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • 10 janvier 2018
    ...the sound discretion of the circuit court, and we will not reverse absent a showing of manifest abuse of discretion. Dimas–Martinez v. State , 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238. Likewise, the balancing mandated by Rule 403 is also a matter left to a circuit court's sound discretion, and an appe......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • Misconduct
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Trial Objections
    • 5 mai 2022
    ...had any impact on his vote in the case. The decision not to grant a mistrial was not an error. ARKANSAS Dimas-Martinez v. State , 385 S.W.3d 238, 246-49 (Ark. 2011). On appeal, the Arkansas Supreme Court granted a new trial in a death penalty murder case when a juror was posting on his Twit......
  • Table of Cases
    • United States
    • Invalid date
    ...Ct. App. 1997), 578, 766 DiMartino v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct., 66 P.3d 945 (Nev. 2003), 670, 673, 674, 688 Dimas-Martinez v. State, 385 S.W.3d 238 (Ark. 2011), 423 Dimick, In re, 969 N.E.2d 17 (Ind. 2012), 528 DiNardo Seaside Tower Ltd. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., 100 A.3d 413 (Conn. App.......
  • GOOGLING A MISTRIAL: ONLINE JUROR MISCONDUCT IN ALABAMA.
    • United States
    • Faulkner Law Review Vol. 14 No. 1, September 2022
    • 22 septembre 2022
    ...Other Internet Trial Torpedoes, JUDGES' J., Winter 2010, at 38 (quoting Commonwealth v. Guisti, 747 N.E.2d 673, 678 (Mass. 2001)). (86) 385 S.W.3d 238 (Ark. 2011). (87) Id. at 246. (88) Id. (89) Id. at 247. (90) Id. (91) Id. at 249. (92) Dimas-Martinez, 385 S.W.3d at 249. (93) Id. at 248. (......
  • Chapter § 7.03 Social Media: A “Must Use” Tool for Jury Consultants
    • United States
    • Full Court Press Emerging Trends in Litigation Management Chapter 7
    • Invalid date
    ...of ‘tweets’ (posts to the social-media website Twitter) during the trial reflecting his disdain for jury duty”); Dimas–Martinez v. State, 385 S.W.3d 238, 242 (Ark. 2011) (“[A] second juror was posting on his Twitter account during the case, and continued to do so even after being questioned......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT