DIMAS-MARTINEZ V. STATE
Docket Number | No. CR 11-5 |
Decision Date | 08 December 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
31 cases
-
Lard v. State
...discretion of the circuit court, and this court will not reverse absent a showing of manifest abuse of discretion. Dimas–Martinez v. State, 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238. Likewise, the balancing mandated by Rule 403 is also a matter left to a circuit court's sound discretion, and an appella......
-
People v. Of
...people share and discuss what is happening at a particular moment in time through the use of ‘tweets.’ " Dimas-Martinez v. State , 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238, 243 n.3 (2011).3 A tweet is a message posted to Twitter that might contain text or other media. A tweet appears on the sender's p......
-
State v. Webster, 13–1095.
...penalty case, a juror tweeted10 throughout the trial and continued to do so even after being told to stop. Dimas–Martinez v. State, 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238, 247–48 (2011). In another case, a tweeting juror rambled about trial proceedings. United States v. Fumo, 639 F.Supp.2d 544, 555 ......
-
Turner v. State
...the sound discretion of the circuit court, and we will not reverse absent a showing of manifest abuse of discretion. Dimas–Martinez v. State , 2011 Ark. 515, 385 S.W.3d 238. Likewise, the balancing mandated by Rule 403 is also a matter left to a circuit court's sound discretion, and an appe......
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Misconduct
...had any impact on his vote in the case. The decision not to grant a mistrial was not an error. ARKANSAS Dimas-Martinez v. State , 385 S.W.3d 238, 246-49 (Ark. 2011). On appeal, the Arkansas Supreme Court granted a new trial in a death penalty murder case when a juror was posting on his Twit......
-
Table of Cases
...Ct. App. 1997), 578, 766 DiMartino v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct., 66 P.3d 945 (Nev. 2003), 670, 673, 674, 688 Dimas-Martinez v. State, 385 S.W.3d 238 (Ark. 2011), 423 Dimick, In re, 969 N.E.2d 17 (Ind. 2012), 528 DiNardo Seaside Tower Ltd. v. Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., 100 A.3d 413 (Conn. App.......
-
GOOGLING A MISTRIAL: ONLINE JUROR MISCONDUCT IN ALABAMA.
...Other Internet Trial Torpedoes, JUDGES' J., Winter 2010, at 38 (quoting Commonwealth v. Guisti, 747 N.E.2d 673, 678 (Mass. 2001)). (86) 385 S.W.3d 238 (Ark. 2011). (87) Id. at 246. (88) Id. (89) Id. at 247. (90) Id. (91) Id. at 249. (92) Dimas-Martinez, 385 S.W.3d at 249. (93) Id. at 248. (......
-
Chapter § 7.03 Social Media: A âMust Useâ Tool for Jury Consultants
...of ‘tweets’ (posts to the social-media website Twitter) during the trial reflecting his disdain for jury duty”); Dimas–Martinez v. State, 385 S.W.3d 238, 242 (Ark. 2011) (“[A] second juror was posting on his Twitter account during the case, and continued to do so even after being questioned......
Get Started for Free