Disciplinary Action Against Genz, Matter of
Decision Date | 27 July 1995 |
Docket Number | No. 950026,950026 |
Citation | 534 N.W.2d 816 |
Parties | In the Matter of the Application for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST the Honorable Donavin L. GRENZ, Judge of the County Court. JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMISSION OF the SUPREME COURT OF the STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Donavin L. GRENZ, Judge of the County Court, Respondent. Civ. |
Court | North Dakota Supreme Court |
Paul W. Jacobson, Asst. Disciplinary Counsel, Bismarck, for petitioner.
Donavin L. Grenz, pro se.
Orell D. Schmitz, of Peterson, Schmitz, Moench & Schmidt, Bismarck, for respondent.
This is a disciplinary proceeding against Donavin L. Grenz, former judge of the county court for Emmons, Kidder, Logan and McIntosh counties. The Judicial Conduct Commission found that Grenz violated Rule 5 G, Rules of Judicial Conduct; N.D.C.C. Sec. 27-07.1-06; and, through violations of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 2 and 641, Rule 2 A, Rules of Judicial Conduct. 1 The Commission recommended public censure for each violation. Grenz seeks either dismissal of the application for disciplinary action or imposition of a private censure.
We are empowered under N.D.C.C. Sec. 27-23-03(3), on the Commission's recommendation, to censure or remove a judge for a willful violation of the Rules of Judicial Conduct. Disciplinary Action Against Wilson, 461 N.W.2d 105 (N.D.1990). We review the Commission's findings and recommendations de novo on the record. Judicial Qualifications Commission v. Schirado, 364 N.W.2d 50 (N.D.1985). Although our review is de novo, we accord due weight to the hearing body's findings because the hearing body had the opportunity to observe the demeanor of the witnesses. Judicial Qualifications Commission v. Cieminski, 326 N.W.2d 883 (N.D.1982). Before a judge may be censured or removed, the charges must be established by clear and convincing evidence. Matter of Cieminski, 270 N.W.2d 321 (N.D.1978).
After graduating from law school and becoming licensed in 1973, Grenz opened a private practice in Linton and was employed as its city attorney. In 1977 or 1978, Grenz was appointed by the city council to the Linton Municipal Airport Authority [LMAA], a "public body corporate and politic" [Sec. 2-06-02, N.D.C.C.] that has as its purpose the maintenance of Linton's airport services. Grenz was elected multi-county judge in November 1982 and began serving in that capacity in early 1983. Grenz was reappointed and continued serving on the LMAA after becoming a judge, the majority of the time as LMAA president. Grenz did not resign from the LMAA until 1992.
On August 17, 1982, Grenz, as president of the LMAA, executed a "Resolution/Authorization" in which the LMAA resolved that it would apply for participation in the federal government surplus property disposition program, see 40 U.S.C. Secs. 484 et seq., which is administered at the state level by the Office of Management and Budget, see N.D.Adm.Code Chapter 4-04-01. A requirement for obtaining surplus property, which appeared on the "Resolution/Authorization" form, was that, from the date of receipt of the property obtained under the program and through a specified period of time after it was placed in use, "the donee shall not sell, trade, lease, lend, bail, cannibalize, encumber, or otherwise dispose of such property, ... without the prior approval of GSA ... or the state agency...."
While Grenz was its president, LMAA obtained items of surplus property under the program. "Distribution Document" forms were used in obtaining the particular items of surplus property and would be signed by representatives of the LMAA. These forms contained the same terms and conditions that appeared on the "Resolution/Authorization" form. As a representative of LMAA, Grenz executed at least two "Distribution Document" forms. While Grenz was president of LMAA, he received newsletters from the North Dakota State Agency for Surplus Property sent to program participants which contained listings of available inventory and prominent reminders of the terms and conditions for the use and disposition of the property obtained.
In September 1986, Grenz applied to the state for "Designation as a Donee Screener," which would allow the screener to travel to military bases to directly acquire property for a program participant.
On August 16, 1990, Grenz drafted an agreement, and entered into it in his capacity as president of LMAA, with Michael L. Gunia. The agreement said various tools and other items of surplus property would be held "in trust for" LMAA "for the respective periods of time required by the Federal Acquisition Rules" and "thereafter conditioned upon payment of the sum of $239.50, said property shall belong solely to ... [Gunia] or his assigns." This agreement was made within the time period during which the property was not to be sold or leased.
On January 14, 1991, Grenz drafted another agreement under which LMAA agreed that Gunia could possess a loader, obtained through the surplus property program, after completion of an 18-month compliance period, in exchange for Gunia's payment of $1,100. This agreement was also made within the time period during which the surplus property was not to be sold or leased.
Shortly before July 28, 1991, Grenz drafted a four-page "Agreement to Lease and Option to Purchase Bucket Scoop," which he signed in his capacity as president of LMAA. Under its terms, the LMAA leased to William Stramer a "payloader bucket scoop," obtained through the surplus property program, for 20 months commencing July 28, 1991, for $1,100. This agreement, too, was made within the period during which the property was not to be sold or leased. The LMAA made a $400 profit on this transaction, which was the sole purpose of Grenz and the LMAA for obtaining the "payloader bucket scoop" from the surplus property program.
In 1992, the General Services Administration sent special agent Brian Murphy to investigate improprieties regarding the handling of surplus property in Linton. Murphy interviewed Grenz and took written statements from him on January 13, 1993, and February 10, 1993. In his February 10 affidavit, signed by Grenz and witnessed by Murphy, Grenz stated:
Grenz was not criminally prosecuted by either federal or state authorities.
We agree with the Commission's finding that Grenz's acceptance of appointment and service as a member of LMAA while serving as a judge constituted a violation of Rule 5 G of the Rules of Judicial Conduct, which provides:
Although Grenz asserts the LMAA is as much a civic organization as "the KC's, Lions or veteran clubs," the record clearly shows that the LMAA is a governmental body that was not concerned with issues of fact or policy on the improvement of the law, the legal system, or the administration of justice. We recognize the difficulty faced by judges in small, rural communities who are often asked and expected as members of those communities to take their turn serving the community in various governmental roles. But the circumstances that arose over Grenz's membership on the LMAA highlight the need for the Rule's proscription. As the Commentary to Rule 5 G emphasizes, the Rule is See also J. Shaman, S. Lubet, J. Alfini, Judicial Conduct and Ethics Sec....
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Disciplinary Action Against McGuire, 20040073.
... 685 N.W.2d 748 2004 ND 171 In the Matter of the Application for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Michael O. McGUIRE, Judge of the District Court ... Judicial Conduct Commission, Petitioner ... ...
-
Mississippi Com'n on Judicial Performance v. Jenkins
... ... a continuance on the hearing of the instant matter, Jenkins filed an Answer to the Formal Complaint. The basis ... This evidence against Jenkins confirms Green's version of the events in which he ... standard of review used in a judicial disciplinary proceeding is derived from Rule 10(E) of the Rules of the ... This action violated Canons 1, 2 A, 2 B, 3 A(1) and 5 C(1) ... ...
-
Judicial Conduct Comm'n v. Corwin (In re Application for Disciplinary Action Against Wickham Corwin), 20130328.
... 843 N.W.2d 830 2014 ND 50 In the Matter of the Application for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Wickham CORWIN, Judge of the District Court. Judicial Conduct Commission, Petitioner v. Wickham ... ...
-
Judicial Conduct Comm'n v. Hagar (In re Hagar)
...891 N.W.2d 735In the MATTER OF the Application for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Richard ... ...